Skip to content

parallel let feedback - #388

Closed
prozacchiwawa wants to merge 3 commits into
20260202-better-test-resultfrom
20260303-parallel-let-part-3
Closed

prozacchiwawa wants to merge 3 commits into
20260202-better-test-resultfrom
20260303-parallel-let-part-3

Conversation

@prozacchiwawa

@prozacchiwawa prozacchiwawa commented Mar 3, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

Medium Risk
Changes compiler name-resolution output for let forms by switching resolved let bodies from Sequential to Parallel, which can affect scoping/ordering semantics in compiled programs. Risk is mitigated by added targeted tests asserting the AST shape and runtime result.

Overview
Fixes a resolver bug where namespace/module resolution rewrote let bindings into a Sequential form, instead of preserving a Parallel let.

Refactors the resolver tests to share a do_program_module_resolution helper and adds test_module_resolve_preserves_parallel_let, which asserts both the program result and that the resolved function body remains BodyForm::Let(LetFormKind::Parallel, _).

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 3b43838. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@cursor cursor Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

Comment thread src/tests/compiler/resolve.rs Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant