docs: correct the 'no hosted deployment' claim - #3
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ROCC is deployed at controlcenter.streamlit.app and rendered its full executive command brief when checked on 2026-07-25, but the README opened by stating no hosted deployment exists. The umbrella TENS-HQ README links that same URL in four places, so the two repos contradicted each other. The README was the incorrect side. Corrected to name the hosted demo and tie why it is safe to host to the governance point the paragraph already makes: every record is synthetic, so there is no applicant data to expose.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ROCC is hosted at https://controlcenter.streamlit.app — verified rendering the Executive Command Brief on 2026-07-25. The README's opening paragraph said the opposite.
This mattered because the umbrella
TENS-HQREADME links that URL in four places and lists ROCC among five live apps, so the two public repos contradicted each other on a fact a visitor can check in one click.The README was the wrong side, not the umbrella. Corrected, and tied the reason it is safe to host back to the governance point the paragraph already makes: every record is synthetic, so there is no applicant data to expose.
Also set the repo
homepagefield to the app URL (it was empty, as it was on four of six repos).Gate green:
ruffall checks passed ·pytest -q23 passed ·validate_demo_data.pypassed.