Repository navigation
Definir o responsável principal ao criar a story - #20
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sem story no Taiga. Um agente relatou que
taiga story create --assigneesó preencheu a lista de responsáveis, e precisou de umstory update --owner-assigneepara o responsável aparecer no card. O comportamento era o projetado (o create nunca enviavaassigned_to), mas não havia como definir o responsável principal na criação, e nem o help, nem o README, nem a skill avisavam disso.O que muda
story createganha--owner-assignee USER: enviaassigned_toe põe o mesmo usuário emassigned_users. Gravar na lista evita que ele saia dos responsáveis numupdateque troque o principal depois (docs/api-notes.md, "assigned_toeassigned_users"). O POST comassigned_tojá estava validado lá (201, a resposta mostra os dois campos).--assignee:--assignee svc --owner-assignee megrava[svc, me]na lista, commecomo principal.usage(exit 2); quem não é membro do projeto énot_found, antes de qualquer escrita.--clear-owner-assigneecontinua só noupdate.--assigneesozinho não muda; o help agora diz que ele não define o responsável principal.SKILL.md,references/comandos.md): a flag nova e a diferença entre as duas no create.Conferência
go vet ./...,go vet -tags integration ./...ego test ./...: passam.--owner-assigneesozinho, com--assigneee repetido como id; valor em branco; usuário de fora do projeto.TestIntegrationStoryAssigneesAndBlock, no Taiga local (compose.test.yml+scripts/taiga-seed): passa, e confere que o create gravaassigned_toe os dois responsáveis.Depois do merge
npx skills update --global --yespara a skill instalada receber o aviso.