Skip to content

test: Add Python security vulnerabilities test case#4

Open
satya-blend360 wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
test/python-security-review
Open

test: Add Python security vulnerabilities test case#4
satya-blend360 wants to merge 9 commits into
mainfrom
test/python-security-review

Conversation

@satya-blend360
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@satya-blend360 satya-blend360 commented May 27, 2026

This test verifies:

  • 🔴 CRITICAL: Hardcoded credentials, SQL injection, command injection
  • 🟠 HIGH: Missing error handling, unsafe eval()
  • 🟡 MEDIUM: Poor error handling, no type hints, division by zero
  • 🟢 LOW: Debug mode in production, PEP 8 violations
  • ✅ GOOD: Well-written function with type hints and parameterized queries

Will test:

  • Python tech stack detection
  • Flask framework detection
  • Severity level tagging for Python-specific issues
  • PEP 8 style guide enforcement

Business Context

What problem does this PR solve?

Key Changes

  • Files/classes affected:

Edge Cases

Testing Done

This test verifies:
- 🔴 CRITICAL: Hardcoded credentials, SQL injection, command injection
- 🟠 HIGH: Missing error handling, unsafe eval()
- 🟡 MEDIUM: Poor error handling, no type hints, division by zero
- 🟢 LOW: Debug mode in production, PEP 8 violations
- ✅ GOOD: Well-written function with type hints and parameterized queries

Will test:
- Python tech stack detection
- Flask framework detection
- Severity level tagging for Python-specific issues
- PEP 8 style guide enforcement
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 AI Code Review — GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI)

🔴 Critical Issues

  • test-python-api.py:6 - Hardcoded credentials (DATABASE_URL, SECRET_KEY, API_TOKEN) pose a significant security risk. Use environment variables instead.
  • test-python-api.py:12 - SQL injection vulnerability in get_user function due to direct string interpolation in SQL query. Use parameterized queries to prevent this.

🟠 High Priority

  • test-python-api.py:23 - Missing error handling in fetch_data function. Wrap the API call in a try/catch block to handle potential failures gracefully.
  • test-python-api.py:28 - Command injection vulnerability in backup_data function due to lack of input validation on filename. Validate and sanitize user input before using it in system commands.

🟡 Medium Issues

  • test-python-api.py:34 - Using eval() in calculate function is dangerous and can lead to code injection. Replace it with a safer alternative for evaluating expressions.
  • test-python-api.py:41 - No zero division check in divide function. Add a check to prevent division by zero and handle the error appropriately.
  • test-python-api.py:51 - Missing type hints and docstrings for process_payment function. Add type hints for parameters and return type, along with a docstring explaining the function's purpose.
  • test-python-api.py:63 - Function names should follow PEP 8 conventions. Rename CalculateTotal to calculate_total and Total to total.

🟢 Low Priority

  • test-python-api.py:66 - Debug mode enabled in production (app.run(debug=True)). This should be set to False in production environments to avoid exposing sensitive information.

✅ Good Practices

  • test-python-api.py:70 - Well-written get_user_by_id function with proper error handling and use of parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection.

BLOCKING_STATUS


Powered by CodeSage | 👍 helpful | 👎 not helpful

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant