Skip to content

[Storage] APIView TypeSpec Changes (pre-emitter support)#42896

Open
vincenttran-msft wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
vincenttran/pull_forward_5_5_26
Open

[Storage] APIView TypeSpec Changes (pre-emitter support)#42896
vincenttran-msft wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
vincenttran/pull_forward_5_5_26

Conversation

@vincenttran-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This PR targets either the main branch of the public specs repo or the RPSaaSMaster branch of the private specs repo. These branches are not intended for iterative development. Therefore, you must acknowledge you understand that after this PR is merged, the APIs are considered shipped to Azure customers. Any further attempts at in-place modifications to the APIs will be subject to Azure's versioning and breaking change policies. Additionally, for control plane APIs, you must acknowledge that you are following all the best practices documented by ARM at aka.ms/armapibestpractices. If you do intend to release the APIs to your customers by merging this PR, add the PublishToCustomers label to your PR in acknowledgement of the above. Otherwise, retarget this PR onto a feature branch, i.e. with prefix release- (see aka.ms/azsdk/api-versions#release--branches).
  • ❌ This PR has at least one breaking change (label: BreakingChangeReviewRequired).
    To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.
  • ❌ The required check named Swagger BreakingChange has failed. To unblock this PR, follow the process at aka.ms/brch.


Comment generated by summarize-checks workflow run.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec label May 5, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

API Change Check

APIView identified API level changes in this PR and created the following API reviews

Language API Review for Package
TypeSpec Storage.Blob
Python azure-storage-blob
JavaScript @azure/storage-blob
Swagger Azure.Storage.Files.DataLake-Microsoft.BlobStorage

Comment generated by After APIView workflow run.

@jalauzon-msft jalauzon-msft marked this pull request as ready for review May 5, 2026 21:15
/** The result of a Filter Blobs API call */
@Xml.name("EnumerationResults")
model FilterBlobSegment {
model FilterBlobResponse {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have these new names been run by architects? I believe they usually prefer Result as a suffix over Response


alias StructuredContentLengthParameter = {
/** Required if the request body is a structured message. Specifies the length of the blob/file content inside the message body. Will always be smaller than Content-Length. */
@access(Access.internal)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be scoped down to just rust? FYI @jeremymeng @jorgerangel-msft @l0lawrence @gracewilcox

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

per offline discussion, seems this isnt an issue for the other langs, Go is pending but we can update as needed in a follow up pr

@catalinaperalta
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@vincenttran-msft to unblock merging into main, typespec validation needs to be passing

@github-actions github-actions Bot added data-plane BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required labels May 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required data-plane Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) TypeSpec Authored with TypeSpec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants