Skip to content

Remove unused IR remote_receiver (IR removed from PCB)#38

Merged
bharvey88 merged 1 commit into
betafrom
remove-ir-receiver
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

Remove unused IR remote_receiver (IR removed from PCB)#38
bharvey88 merged 1 commit into
betafrom
remove-ir-receiver

Conversation

@bharvey88

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version: 26.6.22.1

What does this implement/fix?

Trevor removed the IR hardware from the CAST-1 PCB. Core.yaml still configured a remote_receiver on GPIO07 with dump: all, which:

  • nothing consumed (no remote_receiver binary_sensors, no on-receive actions anywhere)
  • left dump: all logging every received frame as debug noise

Removes the block. No other file references remote_receiver or GPIO07.

Closes #16

Types of changes

  • Bugfix (fixed change that fixes an issue)
  • New feature (thanks!)
  • Breaking change (repair/feature that breaks existing functionality)
  • Dependency Update - Does not publish
  • Other - Does not publish
  • Website of github readme file update - Does not publish
  • Github workflows - Does not publish

Checklist / Checklijst:

  • The code change has been tested and works locally
  • The code change has not yet been tested

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Trevor removed the IR hardware from the CAST-1 PCB; the remote_receiver on
GPIO07 was unused (nothing consumed it) and left dump: all on. Removes it and
bumps version to 26.6.22.1.

Closes #16

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@bharvey88, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 45 minutes and 8 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e4ac051d-0645-42fa-9daf-d72d1fe84308

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f88b5c and 6ed2c4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Integrations/ESPHome/Core.yaml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch remove-ir-receiver

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the bugfix Something isn't working label Jun 22, 2026
@bharvey88 bharvey88 merged commit c53a2d2 into beta Jun 22, 2026
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugfix Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant