Skip to content

The runbook counts the images, instead of recording two of them - #100

Merged
kisielewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/the-runbook-counts-the-images
Sep 7, 2026
Merged

The runbook counts the images, instead of recording two of them#100
kisielewski merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
docs/the-runbook-counts-the-images

Conversation

@kisielewski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The image paragraph added with the 0.1.0 preparation said what that release happened to raise. It was a record, not a step: nothing told the next release to look, and it named two pins out of five.

This repository pins five images in three files, and two of them are pinned twicerustfs in both the development compose file and the test builder. A bump that changes one copy and not the other is exactly what a checklist item can catch and a paragraph cannot.

postgres:18 and the two .NET base images were named nowhere in that context at all. Both cases now say why they move the way they do: the PostgreSQL major is pinned deliberately because 18 moved the data directory, and the .NET images follow the target framework rather than moving on their own.

Nothing else changes, and no pin moves here.

The images were a note about what one release happened to raise, not a
step. There are five pins in three files and two are pinned twice, so a
bump that changes one copy and not the other had nothing watching for it.
postgres and the two .NET images were named nowhere at all.
RustFS and SeaweedFS were raised in three files and left at their old
versions in the table that tells a reader which versions this is exercised
against. The checklist item now says the table is a place to look.
The compose comment explained rc.4 above an image line saying rc.5, and
two records read as standing claims about a pin that has moved.
@kisielewski
kisielewski merged commit 1eaf194 into main Sep 7, 2026
3 checks passed
@kisielewski
kisielewski deleted the docs/the-runbook-counts-the-images branch September 7, 2026 20:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant