Version Packages - #431
Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
force-pushed
the
changeset-release/main
branch
from
August 23, 2026 06:12
92fd647 to
8464664
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and publish to npm yourself or setup this action to publish automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.
Releases
@0no-co/graphqlsp@1.18.0
Minor Changes
graphql()call-expression documents. When you select one or more complete fields inside a document's selection set, the editor now offers an "Extract to fragment" action under the "GraphQL" refactor group, which creates a newgraphql()fragment document (named after the fields' parent type) above the current statement, replaces the selected fields with a fragment spread, and adds the new fragment variable to the call's fragment arraySubmitted by @JoviDeCroock (See #412)
fragment PokemonFields on Pokemon) or at a spread (...PokemonFields) — now lists the definition and every spread of that fragment across the project's source files, and renaming from any of those locations updates all of them at once, including fragments defined in othergraphql()calls in the same file and fragments imported from other filesSubmitted by @JoviDeCroock (See #409)
gql.tada/ts-plugin, detected through a shared marker on the language service), adopts the project's tsconfigpluginsentry when the plugin package isn't installed locally, falls back to editor settings passed throughconfigurePlugin, and otherwise stays dormant instead of reporting configuration errors in projects that never set up GraphQLSPSubmitted by @JoviDeCroock (See #416)
newFieldinstead" or "replaced bynewField") offer a fix that swaps in the replacement, and unused fields reported by field-usage tracking offer a fix that removes them from the document — unless the removal would leave the parent selection set emptySubmitted by @JoviDeCroock (See #413)
ParentType.fieldName(arg: ArgType = default): ReturnType— in the editor's display string, with the schema description and any@deprecated: <reason>notice (falling back to the spec default "No longer supported") rendered as documentation, plus adeprecatedJSDoc tag so editors can render strikethrough. Hover now also works on field and directive arguments (showing the argument's type, default value, and description), enum values, and named types such as fragment type conditions (on Pokemon)Submitted by @JoviDeCroock (See #411)
Patch Changes
ENOENT: no such file or directory, unlink '<output>.d.ts.tmp'failures when multiple plugin instances write the sametadaOutputLocation, e.g. several TS projects in a monorepo extending a shared tsconfig. The typings swap-file now has a unique name per process and write, so concurrent regenerations no longer clobber each other's swap-files, and swap-file cleanup no longer masks the original write errorSubmitted by @macrozone (See #420)