Welcome to Fair Code Discussions #201
Replies: 9 comments 8 replies
|
yo made it |
|
cool, now we're talking. |
|
uhh yeah im working in an org StudentSuite im a part of it with my other dev frd and its about like resources and all for students |
|
I think u should start thinking about spliting the CI tests based on the path or file changed |
|
sorry for the mistakes today I am a bit tired so I am taking the rest of the day off if there is anything that requires urgent follow up pls let me now. |
|
I added the test coverage but I didn't run it since I am not sure what u mean by optional if I add this part it will run but not block PRs and pushes |
|
@ahmdkaml @Shreyash0712 sorry for being inactive i'm currently building a hackathon project with my friend so im busy there i will be more active in the next 4-5 days |
|
@ahmdkaml @Shreyash0712 i'm planning to make a mcp for fair code asw do u think its a good idea or no? if yes/no why |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Turning on Discussions so there's a place for the stuff that doesn't fit an issue or a PR - questions, ideas, "hey what do you think about X," that kind of thing.
@ahmdkaml, this one's mostly for you given how much of the recent profiler/CI/testing work has been yours, but it's open to anyone. A few starting categories:
faircodeor an audit? show it offOne thing worth knowing if you haven't already: the repo's benchmark results are cited in a paper currently in peer review, so there's a paper freeze in effect (details in CLAUDE.md) - it doesn't block most contributions, just new audits and anything that'd change the frozen numbers. Good topic for here if anything about that is unclear.
Otherwise, feel free to open a thread for whatever's on your mind.
All reactions