[css-navigation-1] Use at/with rather than current/other, for now.

For now, this changes the keywords to use at/with rather than
current/other, but has issues about the option to switch.

Author: dbaron

css-navigation-1/Overview.bs

@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ with <<navigation-condition>> defined as:
                     <<navigation-type-test>>
 
 <dfn><<navigation-location-test>></dfn> = <<navigation-location-keyword>> : <<navigation-location>>
-<dfn><<navigation-location-keyword>></dfn> = at | other | from | to
+<dfn><<navigation-location-keyword>></dfn> = at | with | from | to
 <dfn><<navigation-location>></dfn> = <<route-name>> | <<url-pattern()>>
 <dfn><<route-name>></dfn> = <<dashed-ident>>
 
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ with <<navigation-condition>> defined as:
 <dfn><<navigation-type-keyword>></dfn> = traverse | back | forward | reload
 </pre>
 
-ISSUE: Should we use ''at'' or ''current''?
+ISSUE: Should we use ''at''/''with''/''from''/''to'' or ''current''/''other''/''from''/''to''?
 
 The above grammar is purposely very loose for forwards-compatibility reasons,
 since the <<general-enclosed>> production
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ as follows:
         the [=navigation location URL pattern=] of <<navigation-location>>
         and <var>input</var> as the document's [=Document/URL=].
 
-    : other: <<navigation-location>>
+    : with: <<navigation-location>>
     :: The result is true if
         the [=current other URL=] <var>other</var> of the document is non-null and
         [=URL pattern/match|match a URL pattern=] is non-null when
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ by matching the relevant parts of the navigation URL to the link URL.
 
    This depends on the --movie-details-with-id route
    declaring the ID but not the language with a named
-   parameter, and the use of match-params(navigation-other).
+   parameter, and the use of match-params(navigation-with).
 
    This means that both the of the link and the other URL of
    the current navigation match the URL pattern defined by
@@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ by matching the relevant parts of the navigation URL to the link URL.
    */
 .movie-container:has(
     > .movie-title:link-to(--movie-details-with-id
-                             with match-params(navigation-other))) {
+                             with match-params(navigation-with))) {
 
   view-transition-name: movie-container;
 
@@ -485,11 +485,12 @@ and the pseudo-class matches any element where:
   // with identical syntax.
 <dfn><<navigation-match>></dfn> = <<pattern-match-type>>( <<navigation-match-target>> )
 <dfn><<pattern-match-type>></dfn> = match-pattern | match-params | match-url
-<dfn><<navigation-match-target>></dfn> = navigation-other | navigation-current |
+<dfn><<navigation-match-target>></dfn> = navigation-at | navigation-with |
                             navigation-from | navigation-to
 </pre>
 
-ISSUE: Should we use ''navigation-at'' or ''navigation-current''?
+ISSUE: Should we use ''navigation-''-(''at''/''with''/''from''/''to'') or
+''navigation-''/(''current''/''other''/''from''/''to'')?
 
 ISSUE: Should the '':link-to()'' variant that has a <<link-condition>> have a different name,
 such as '':navigating-link()''?
@@ -530,10 +531,10 @@ if the following steps return true:
 1. Let <var>matchTarget</var> be the <<navigation-match-target>> argument
     of the <<navigation-match>>.
 1. Let <var>navigationURL</var> be:
-    : If <var>matchTarget</var> is ''navigation-other'',
-    :: the <a>current other URL</a> of the document.
-    : Otherwise, if <var>matchTarget</var> is ''navigation-current'',
+    : If <var>matchTarget</var> is ''navigation-at'',
     :: the document's [[=Document/URL=]].
+    : Otherwise, if <var>matchTarget</var> is ''navigation-with'',
+    :: the <a>current other URL</a> of the document.
     : Otherwise, if <var>matchTarget</var> is ''navigation-from'',
     :: the <a>current from URL</a> of the document.
     : Otherwise (Assert: <var>matchTarget</var> is ''navigation-to''),