From 9cf35a46b746beec90711a390ccd2cea667dce25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tomoki Kobayashi Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 20:39:36 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Point the landing page at the new teaser video Both language copies of the embed move from b2wOul8UPWA to BG4qyHeimHE, the film made by the teaser rig (#132): the same program built by trial and error, now as a two-minute 1080p cut with captions and a camera. The `si` parameter is left off. It only records who shared the link, and there is no share of this one to paste it from. Otherwise the tag is YouTube's own as before. The CSS note about the player's black pillarbox goes too, because the new film is 16:9 and fills the box. --- site/index.html | 15 ++++++++------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/site/index.html b/site/index.html index defa425..06108b8 100644 --- a/site/index.html +++ b/site/index.html @@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ fetched. Only a script could stop the second one, and the language machinery here never hides behind a script. - The tag is YouTube's own embed code, pasted as it hands it over — - `frameborder`, the `si` parameter, the generic title and all. Only the - styling below is ours. + The tag is YouTube's own embed code — `frameborder`, the generic title + and all — less the `si` parameter, which only records who shared the + link. Only the styling below is ours. A player that says "error 153" is being read over `file://`, and the markup is not the reason. The iframe's origin is `null` there, YouTube @@ -208,8 +208,9 @@ `python3 -m http.server` inside it — rather than by opening the file. The box is 16:9 and reserved by aspect-ratio, so nothing reflows when the - player arrives; the recording is an iPad's, so YouTube pillarboxes it - inside that and the black is the player's own. `height: auto` is what + player arrives, and the film is cut to 1920×1080 (#132), so it fills the + box edge to edge. (The iPad recording before it was pillarboxed inside + the box, and the black was the player's own.) `height: auto` is what makes that work and is not decoration: the tag's `width`/`height` land as presentational hints, `width: 100%` outranks one of them but nothing here was overriding the other, and `aspect-ratio` is ignored while both @@ -367,7 +368,7 @@

Snap blocks together, and watch the tortoise draw.