Trim "Provider native agentic tools" → "Native provider tools" in sub-bullet

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: rmdevpro

layout-tests/01-split-hero.html

@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
           <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
           <li>There are massive advantages to sticking with provider native agentic tools.
             <ul>
-              <li>Provider native agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
+              <li>Native provider tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
               <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
               <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
               <li>Global standards and concepts now allow for interoperability between provider native agentic tools.</li>

layout-tests/02-image-anchor.html

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
       <li>There are massive advantages to sticking with provider native agentic tools.
         <ul>
-          <li>Provider native agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
+          <li>Native provider tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
           <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
           <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
           <li>Global standards and concepts now allow for interoperability between provider native agentic tools.</li>

layout-tests/03-editorial-alternating.html

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
       <li>There are massive advantages to sticking with provider native agentic tools.
         <ul>
-          <li>Provider native agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
+          <li>Native provider tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
           <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
           <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
           <li>Global standards and concepts now allow for interoperability between provider native agentic tools.</li>

layout-tests/04-banner-card-grid.html

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
       <li>There are massive advantages to sticking with provider native agentic tools.
         <ul>
-          <li>Provider native agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
+          <li>Native provider tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
           <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
           <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
           <li>Global standards and concepts now allow for interoperability between provider native agentic tools.</li>

layout-tests/05-sticky-image.html

@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
       <li>There are massive advantages to sticking with provider native agentic tools.
         <ul>
-          <li>Provider native agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
+          <li>Native provider tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
           <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
           <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
           <li>Global standards and concepts now allow for interoperability between provider native agentic tools.</li>

open-source/blueprint-agentic-workbench.html

@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ <h1>Blueprint Agentic Workbench.</h1>
       <li>Teams of agents are far more powerful than agents with sub-agents.</li>
       <li>There are massive advantages to sticking with provider native agentic tools.
         <ul>
-          <li>Provider native agentic tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
+          <li>Native provider tools outperform third-party tools due to integrations with their models.</li>
           <li>Third-party developers can't match the multi-billion-dollar investments major providers pour into their own agentic tools.</li>
           <li>Provider subscriptions with native tools cost a fraction of pay-per-use options.</li>
           <li>Global standards and concepts now allow for interoperability between provider native agentic tools.</li>