diff --git a/.changeset/9223-adr-0055-item-5-amendment.md b/.changeset/9223-adr-0055-item-5-amendment.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ea34f949dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.changeset/9223-adr-0055-item-5-amendment.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+---
+
+Record under item 5 of `docs/adr/0055-parameterized-bare-data-surface.md` that
+`@objectstack/spec`'s `objectNavTargetExclusivity` superseded the
+`recordId` -> `filters` -> `viewName` precedence the item states; the item's own
+text is kept byte-for-byte (objectui#9223). Decision-record prose only; no
+package is released by this change.
diff --git a/docs/adr/0055-parameterized-bare-data-surface.md b/docs/adr/0055-parameterized-bare-data-surface.md
index 0814f3f023..eeaf0d0a00 100644
--- a/docs/adr/0055-parameterized-bare-data-surface.md
+++ b/docs/adr/0055-parameterized-bare-data-surface.md
@@ -54,6 +54,12 @@ routes untouched:
    graduates to a named view only when curated and reused (see the
    app-composition guide).
 
+   **Amended 2026-09-13:** superseded by `@objectstack/spec`'s
+   `objectNavTargetExclusivity` (17.4.0; objectui#8563 chains it on
+   `NavigationItemSchema`): `filters` is refused with `recordId` or
+   `viewName`, `runAction` with `recordId`; `recordId` + `viewName` is
+   tolerated. The precedence above no longer applies.
+
 ## Security model
 
 A view was never a security boundary, and neither is this surface. It shows