QA run · priority:P0 · e4e5c6e3 · 2026-08-17 · 7 PASS / 7 PARTIAL / 2 FAIL / 2 BLOCKED

[os-zhuang]

Round R1 of the platform-checklist wave tracked at #9296 — the release-gating smoke set, run locally in the R0-provisioned tree to answer "is anything release-blocking broken?" ahead of the three cloud sessions.

Two P0 failures found. Both were surfaced on #9296 the moment they survived second derivation, rather than held to round end:

• DELETE broken for any object targeted by a multiple: true reference — a regression.
• The datasource-admin HTTP family is reachable unauthenticated, read and write — access-control hole; reproduction deliberately withheld from this issue and posted on tracking: full platform-checklist regression against main @ e4e5c6e3 — five-round orchestration #9296 instead, per the wave's withhold rule.

Environment fingerprint

framework sha (subject)	e4e5c6e3c608b1b807c83a0d5b734f213eb1a1dd — not moved
.objectui-sha (pin)	665661ab093263f39f2e660a295ea615dbcee35a
console dist stamp	665661ab093263f39f2e660a295ea615dbcee35a — stamp == pin, /_console/ served 200 text/html
spec source	PR #9309 head fbd1c0491215406c379405cef262befad1de458d (verified with git rev-parse FETCH_HEAD; in the merge queue at run time, not yet on main). docs/qa/platform-checklist/ is byte-identical to the earlier d23a746c7 — the newer commit only merges main — so the ledger ran is exactly the reviewed one
validator	check-platform-checklist: OK — 15 areas, 190 items (190 active); coverage: 30 kinds mapped, 0 waived
selector	node scripts/checklist-select.mjs priority:P0 --json → 18 runnable items (16 → 18 after the R4 sweep, as predicted)
ports / DBs	3110 file:/tmp/qa-wave/r1-core.db · 3111 r1-portshift.db · 3112 r1-del.db (band 3110–3129, ≤3 concurrent)
seed	--seed-admin → admin@objectos.ai / admin123; members rls-a@verify.test, rls-b@verify.test
repo hygiene	nothing committed; git status shows only docs/qa/**. No JSON, no screenshots, no PR

Boot: health 200, /api/v1/ready → {"status":"ready","state":"running"}, Seeds: com.example.showcase 130 rows, 0 ERROR lines.

Environment correction worth carrying forward: Playwright 1.62.1 expects chromium build 1234; this box has only chromium-1194. The first e2e attempt reported 31 failed — pure environment, zero product signal. Passing launchOptions.executablePath=/opt/pw-browsers/chromium-1194/chrome-linux/chrome turns it into 31 passed. Any later round that runs Playwright here must set this or it will file a spectacular false P0.

Scope — per-item revision and derived verdict

#	item	rev	surface	verdict
1	access-security.rls-both-sides	3	api	partial
2	access-security.write-path-guards	2	api	pass
3	access-security.crud-permission-matrix	1	api	partial
4	access-security.owd-sharing-matrix	2	api	pass
5	access-security.anonymous-deny-surfaces	1	api	pass
6	access-security.no-active-org-session-semantics	1	api	blocked(fixture)
7	ai.mcp-stdio-fail-closed	3	cli	partial
8	api-backend.query-contract-matrix	1	api	partial
9	approvals.account-app-entry	1	browser	partial
10	cli.dev-boot-contract	2	cli	partial
11	integration-system.datasource-credential-refusal-matrix	1	mixed	FAIL
12	platform-core.boot-health	2	mixed	pass
13	platform-core.seed-integrity	1	api	pass
14	platform-core.console-login	2	browser	pass
15	platform-core.nav-surfaces-render	3	browser	pass
16	platform-core.builtin-apps-nav-render	1	browser	partial
17	records-forms.crud-roundtrip	3	browser	FAIL
18	studio-authoring.first-run-loop	1	mixed	blocked(fixture)

Per-clause verdicts (text oracle evidence)

Automated refs run and cited (RUNNER rule 6) — 8 items

ref	result
8 access-security dogfood files (anonymous-deny, private-owd, owner-anchor-and-bulk-writes, static-readonly, readonly-when-parent, public-read-owd, controlled-by-parent, invoice-cbp)	8 files / 58 tests passed, 0 failed (130s)
packages/mcp/src/__tests__/plugin.test.ts	17 passed, incl. all 4 ADR-0101 stdio fail-closed cases
packages/objectql/src/engine.test.ts	135 passed (the ERROR log lines are deliberate negative-path assertions)
examples/app-showcase/e2e/showcase-smoke.spec.ts	31 passed — all 31 nav surfaces render, no pageerror, charts laid out
objectstack verify	15 verified, 0 gaps, 0 FAILED, 1 needs-fixture, 7 skipped — reproduces R0 exactly
objectstack verify --rls	20 PROVEN, 0 HOLES; 9/9 position personas probed, 0 HOLES across all
packages/plugins/plugin-security/src/no-active-organization-write-refusal.test.ts	19 passed (corroboration for item 6, see below)

⚠️ objectstack verify --rls is a separate invocation. R0's reading (and my first pass) ran bare objectstack verify, which emits no RLS section at all — runRlsProofs only runs behind the --rls flag. Any round citing plain verify as the oracle for an RLS clause has not actually consulted it.

1 · access-security.rls-both-sides (rev 3) → partial

clause	verdict	oracle evidence
0 A's list is exactly A's	pass	A list total=2 ["A note 1","A note 2"]; B list total=1 ["B note 1"] — presence and absence, both directions
1 foreign by-id read denied	pass	A → B's note: 404 RECORD_NOT_FOUND (not-found-shaped denial, permitted)
2 foreign by-id write denied, row unchanged	pass	A PATCH → 403 PERMISSION_DENIED; admin re-read body="b1", updated_at unchanged from creation
3 admin reads full set	pass	admin list total=3 — all three run-created ids
4 runRlsProofs no holes	pass	20 PROVEN (20 consistent, 0 HOLES); all 9 position personas 0 HOLES
5 skips explainable + D11 probe	blocked(dependency)	see below

Clause 5: the 3 skips are each benign — showcase_project_membership "no plain-text probe field", showcase_ext_customer/showcase_ext_order external read-only. Hand spot-check of the skipped object: member A → 403 PERMISSION_DENIED, admin sees rows, i.e. genuinely protected. But the clause requires judging against a write-up held privately with the maintainer and deliberately absent from this repo — this runner does not hold it, and the clause says never to tick it green over that. Recorded blocked(dependency), not pass. Nothing about it is restated here.

5 · access-security.anonymous-deny-surfaces (rev 1) → pass

The dogfood pin covers /data, /meta, /actions, /automation, /packages (25 tests). It does not cover /batch or /security/explain, both named in the item's variants — driven by hand so the item is not left partial:

variant (anonymous)	status	envelope family
GET /api/v1/data/showcase_private_note	401 UNAUTHENTICATED	rest-flat
GET /api/v1/meta	401 UNAUTHENTICATED	rest-flat
POST /api/v1/actions/showcase_task/showcase_mark_done/anon-probe-id	401, not 404	dispatcher-wrapper
GET /api/v1/automation	401 UNAUTHENTICATED	dispatcher-wrapper
POST /api/v1/batch	401 UNAUTHENTICATED	rest-flat
GET /api/v1/security/explain	401 UNAUTHENTICATED	rest-flat

Exactly the two declared families, mapped as the item specifies — no third dialect. Member contrast: data + meta both 200. Declared-public route: anonymous GET /api/v1/forms/<slug> → 404 FORM_NOT_FOUND, not 401 — the gate keys on declared posture, not blanket. Destructive negative: anonymous DELETE /api/v1/automation/showcase_reassign_wizard → 401, and an authed listing still shows the flow among 29.

12 · platform-core.boot-health (rev 2) → pass

health 200 · /ready 200 {"status":"ready","state":"running"} · Flows banner 29 flow(s) 22 bound … · 7 draft with no ⚠ and 0 ERROR lines · /_console/ 200 text/html 6467 bytes · nav diff empty — served grp_data children equal the 12 authored in src/ui/apps/index.ts, nothing added or dropped.

3 WARN lines exist, none of them a SeedLoader rejection: one is the #8686 autonumber tenancy note (which fires at 13:37:39, 3 s before the default organization row is created at 13:37:42 — the "0 rows in sys_organization" it reports is a boot-ordering artifact, not the steady state), and two are SHARING_NOT_ENABLED rule-backfill failures for share_open_tasks_with_manager / share_red_projects_with_execs. Those two mean the showcase ships two authored sharing rules that can never be consulted — noted as a fixture observation, not scored here.

13 · platform-core.seed-integrity (rev 1) → pass

Counts re-derived from src/data/seed/index.ts rather than trusted from the item's baseline. All match, and are identical after a restart against the same DB (idempotent upsert, 130 rows both boots, no rejection lines): account 14 · contact 32 · project 5 · task 10 · invoice 12 · invoice_line 5 · expense_report 4 · expense_line 13 · field_zoo 2 · announcement 2 · product 4 · team 2 · category 4 · preference 1.

Values verbatim: f_multiselect ["red","green"], f_json {"nested":{"k":"v"},"list":[1,2,3]} structurally intact, f_lookup resolves to the real Northwind account id. Expected-absent fields (f_user, f_users, f_secret) null as documented.

14 · platform-core.console-login (rev 2) → pass

clause	verdict	evidence
0 lands in shell	pass	screenshot showed the ObjectOS shell — greeting "Good afternoon, Dev Admin", header/search/avatar, "Your apps 2", "3 pending approvals"; 0 password fields; url /_console/home
1 session survives reload	pass	post-reload 200 GET /api/v1/runtime/config, 200 /auth/get-session, 200 /i18n/translations/en; no bounce to login
2 cleared session → 401 on the wire	pass	after clearCookies(), in-page fetch /api/v1/meta/app → 401 UNAUTHENTICATED
3 console returns to login	pass	navigation redirected to /_console/login?redirect=%2Fapps%2Fshowcase_app%2Fshowcase_project, login surface rendered — not a dead shell
4 re-auth restores	pass	back at /_console/home, authed fetch → 200
NEG wrong password	pass	401 POST /api/v1/auth/sign-in/email, no cookies set, visible error "Invalid email or password"

0 page errors across the whole drive.

17 · records-forms.crud-roundtrip (rev 3) → FAIL

clause	verdict	evidence
0 create + verbatim re-read	pass	201, name/status/industry returned verbatim
1 update touches only the edited field	pass	before/after full-row diff = ["updated_at","annual_revenue"]; null → 123456
2 delete removes the row	FAIL	400 INVALID_FILTER; row survives
3 list reflects mutations after reload	not-run	browser walk not driven this round
4 History tab	not-run	browser walk not driven this round
5 unicode round-trip	pass	os-qa-r1-华宁 read back byte-identical
6 clone re-derives engine-owned columns	pass	201, new id ≠ source, sourceId echoed, values copied, created_at re-derived
7 clone RLS-gated	blocked(fixture)	member A can read showcase_account (public_read_write), so no non-reading persona is bound on this boot — the item explicitly allows recording this as blocked. A's clone returned 403 PERMISSION_DENIED (no create grant), which does not exercise the 404 path the clause is about
NEG missing required status	pass, checklist wrong	see checklist findings
NEG bad tax_id	pass	400 VALIDATION_FAILED, fields:[{field:"tax_id",code:"invalid_format"}]

Reproduction rule for clause 2 — full write-up and causal chain in the #9296 comment:

DELETE /api/v1/data/showcase_account/<any id>

• expected: 200, row gone.
• actual: 400 {"code":"INVALID_FILTER","object":"showcase_account","error":"The bare equality spelling { \"f_lookups\": value } WAS NOT APPLIED: … Use \"$contains\" …"}, and a follow-up GET on the same id returns 200 — the row survives.

Cause: packages/objectql/src/engine.ts:10112 probes dependents with find(childName, { where: { [fieldName]: id } }) — bare equality — for every referencing field. showcase_field_zoo.f_lookups is Field.lookup('showcase_account', { multiple: true }), a JSON-valued column the engine's own #5869 filter guard refuses. The catch below rethrows anything that is not a missing-table error, so the probe failure aborts the delete.

Marked regression: before the #8895 hardening that catch swallowed probe failures, so this delete previously succeeded (while silently skipping the integrity check). The #8895 change is correct in itself — it converted a silent fail-open into a loud refusal, which is what made the pre-existing bad filter shape visible. The remedy is the one the error text itself gives: $contains for multi-value fields.

Scope measured, not assumed: showcase_team / showcase_category / showcase_announcement / showcase_private_note / showcase_project delete 200; showcase_product → 409 DELETE_RESTRICTED (correct guard); sys_user → 405 OBJECT_API_METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED, which is the only reason the multi-value Field.user columns (f_users, team_members) don't reach the same probe. On stock showcase the blast radius is exactly showcase_account; the framework rule is broader.

11 · integration-system.datasource-credential-refusal-matrix (rev 1) → FAIL

clause	verdict	evidence
0 every inline-credential door refuses at publish	not-run	the 6-door publish matrix was not driven this round
1 credentialsRef alternative works	not-run	not driven
2 both read doors redact	pass	no cleartext in either door; /datasources/showcase_external → hasSecret:false, redactedConfigKeys:[]; metadata door shows config.filename only. The two doors agree
3 redaction presence-preserving	partial	only an unset-credential datasource exists on stock showcase, so the set-vs-unset distinction could not be exercised
4 legacy alias spellings redacted	blocked(fixture)	requires planting a stored row directly; not done — the item mandates recording this rather than passing it
5 unknown-driver canonical keys redacted	not-run	not driven
6 echoed-mask write guard	not-run	not driven
7 non-admin/anonymous get no more than admin	FAIL	anonymous responses are byte-identical to the platform admin's on both read doors; anonymous create returns 201 and anonymous delete 204

Reproduction withheld from this issue per the wave's rule for real access-control holes — it is on #9296 for the maintainer. Summary only: the datasource-admin family is mounted directly on IHttpServer by a CLI-built plugin, bypassing the @objectstack/rest enforceAuth seam, with no guard in the registrar (packages/services/service-datasource/src/admin-routes.ts:113). The family's own ledger already describes this posture as "mounted, working, and guarded by nothing". #7744 closed having added ledger entries without adding a guard; I find no open issue tracking the authentication hole itself. Long-standing, therefore not labelled a regression.

6 · access-security.no-active-org-session-semantics (rev 1) → blocked(fixture)

Brand-new ADR-0123 item, never run before. Its own fixture precondition is not met on stock showcase, so every clause is vacuous — the item instructs confirming the posture before scoring, and that is what this verdict records.

Posture evidence, three independent sources agreeing:

1. Boot banner: Tenancy: single.
2. Runtime log, authoritative: [security] tenancy posture 'single' — Layer 0 is inert; the platform's own tenant-scoped RLS policies are stripped (ADR-0105 D3).
3. Source: tenant-layer.ts:119 — if (!postureEnforcesWall(input.tenancyPosture)) return null — single contributes no wall.

The state itself is also not producible here: a fresh signup lands with activeOrganizationId: "org_msxa3kt9sxctxowj" (the seeded Default Organization), so the racy producer the item names is unavailable and the removed-member producer needs a fixture nobody ships.

Corroboration rather than a verdict: plugin-security/src/no-active-organization-write-refusal.test.ts runs 19/19 green at this sha and pins every clause of this item at unit level — including a control that is precisely "the single posture has no wall, so an org-less write is ordinary", i.e. the test itself agrees the showcase configuration makes this vacuous.

18 · studio-authoring.first-run-loop (rev 1) → blocked(fixture)

Studio is not installed in the showcase. The boot plugin list carries @objectstack/setup and @objectstack/account but no studio plugin; GET /api/v1/meta/app as platform admin returns ["showcase_app","setup","account"], and the post-login screenshot independently shows "Your apps 2" (Showcase, Setup). STUDIO_APP exists (packages/platform-objects/src/apps/studio.app.ts, name: 'studio', requiredPermissions: ['studio.access']) and packages/apps/studio ships, but the showcase config does not install it. Every step of this item begins in Studio, so nothing is scoreable. Clause 5 (server-side read-only-package gate) is independently reachable via API and was not driven this round.

Remaining partials — what was and was not proved

• 2 write-path-guards → pass via the 3-file automation pin (17 tests: owner forge/disown/transfer, bulk update+delete scoping, static readonly stripping, parent-scoped readonlyWhen, X-ObjectStack-Dropped-Fields). Clause mapping inherited from the pin, not independently re-driven.
• 4 owd-sharing-matrix → pass via its 4-file pin (16 tests: private OWD, public-read OWD, controlled-by-parent both fixtures). Clause 4 deliberately not double-counted against the private D11 defect — the item's own negative says it is recorded once, on rls-both-sides.
• 3 crud-permission-matrix → the verify half is green (CRUD 15/0/0, RLS 0 holes, 9 position personas). Clause 6 requires a verdict per cell across ~31 access-matrix rows × 4 verbs with a member provisioned per permission set; not driven. Honest partial, not pass.
• 7 ai.mcp-stdio-fail-closed → the 4 ADR-0101 unit cases are green (keyless refusal, unresolvable key, objectql unavailable, no key demanded when stdio is off). The api clauses (member-keyed MCP reads vs REST row/field sets, aggregate parity, FLS aggregate-input gate, revocation on next read) were not driven — they need a real stdio transport with a provisioned API key.
• 8 api-backend.query-contract-matrix → driven live: $top/$skip window 200; $select narrows to exactly name,status; $orderby on a bad field → 400 INVALID_SORT; scalar comparand on a collection operator → 400 INVALID_FILTER; unknown $-param → 400 UNSUPPORTED_QUERY_PARAM; unknown field → 400 INVALID_FIELD; empty-list boundary {status:{$in:[]}} → 200/0 rows and {status:{$nin:[]}} → 200/18 rows (full visible set), both spellings. Clause 4 (expand RLS/FLS) rests on the engine pin. Clauses 0 and 8 (full operator matrix set-equality, verdict per variant) not driven → partial.
• 9 approvals.account-app-entry → clause 0 pass on the build oracle: grep -o 'approvals:inbox' packages/console/dist/assets/index-*.js hits in index-B1QKp1HQ.js, so the registration survives bundling — exactly what the item says the unit pin cannot see. Clauses 1–6 need the non-admin persona plus a drawer walk; not driven.
• 10 cli.dev-boot-contract → clause 0 pass (health/ready//_console); clause 4 pass — instance B on a busy port printed ↪ server bound to port 3111 (requested 3110) and the banner advertised 3111, no silent divergence; clause 6 pass — no config, no artifact exits 1 with the exact remedy Run in a directory with objectstack.config.ts, pass --artifact <path|url>, or run from the monorepo root. Clauses 1, 2, 3, 5 (seed idempotence under a changed --admin-password, the DB-resolution matrix, --fresh tempdir, stale-artifact warning) not driven.
• 16 builtin-apps-nav-render → clause 3 pass, server-side: member GET /api/v1/meta/app?id=setup → {"items":[]} while admin gets items:1; the member's app list is ["showcase_app","account"] vs the admin's ["showcase_app","setup","account"] — the server prunes, the launcher does not merely hide. Clause 4 pass (all Setup entries absent for the member; nav_jwks absent for admin too, per Setup › Advanced › Signing Keys (JWKS) is a dead nav entry — sys_jwks is API-disabled and a requiredPermissions gate cannot prune it #7544, so it proves nothing either way). Clause 1 partial — Setup's 9 group anchors and Account's Profile/Inbox/Security/Developer all present; Studio absent per item 18. Clauses 0/2/6 (per-destination render walk) not driven.

Checklist accuracy findings — for the ledger owner, not product defects

Each of these made a correct product behaviour look wrong on first read. Filed here rather than edited into the tree (this round commits nothing).

1. platform-core.seed-integrity step 1 states showcase_contact=33 (9 named + 24 bulk prospects). The seed authors 8 named + 24 = 32, and the server reports 32. The baseline is stale; the item's own instruction to re-derive from the seed module is what saved the clause from a false FAIL.
2. platform-core.boot-health step 6 / clause 3 and builtin-apps-nav-render steps 0–1 use GET /api/v1/meta/app?id=com.example.showcase (and ?id=com.objectstack.setup / .studio / .account). That parameter keys on the app name, not the package id — the showcase app is showcase_app, the built-ins are setup / studio / account. The documented spellings return {"type":"app","items":[]}, which reads exactly like "the app metadata is gone". The dogfood skill §1 carries the same shape and would benefit from the same correction.
3. records-forms.crud-roundtrip negative expects a direct POST missing required status to answer 400 VALIDATION_FAILED with code:'required'. showcase_account.status is required: true but its prospect option carries default: true, so the default satisfies it and the row is created with status:"prospect". Correct behaviour; the negative as written can never hold for this object.
4. access-security.no-active-org-session-semantics carries no automated.ref, yet plugin-security/src/no-active-organization-write-refusal.test.ts pins every one of its clauses at unit level. Per RUNNER rule 6's converse, that test is the natural automated value for a future revision — and it would tell any runner up front that the showcase posture makes the item vacuous.
5. access-security.rls-both-sides clause 4 and crud-permission-matrix both name runRlsProofs as the oracle without noting it requires objectstack verify --rls. Bare verify prints no RLS section, so the flag is load-bearing.

Fixture gaps

• tenancy: single on stock showcase makes the whole ADR-0123 tenant-semantics surface unscoreable (item 6). A walled fixture — or a documented isolated/group boot recipe — is what would unblock it.
• Studio is not installed in the showcase, so item 18 and the Studio third of item 16 have no surface.
• No non-reading persona is bound on a stock boot, so the clone-RLS clause (17/7) cannot be exercised; showcase_account is public_read_write.
• integration-system.… clauses 3 and 4 need a datasource with a bound credential and a directly-planted legacy-alias row; neither exists on stock showcase.
• Two authored sharing rules (share_open_tasks_with_manager, share_red_projects_with_execs) fail backfill at every boot with SHARING_NOT_ENABLED — they are inert fixtures.

Anti-false-positive work this round

Three findings were disproven before they reached this issue, which is the protocol earning its cost:

• "31 e2e surfaces failed" — Playwright/chromium build mismatch, not the product. 31/31 pass with the right executablePath.
• "showcase_reassign_wizard was deleted / is missing" — my parser read f.name from data.flows, which is an array of strings. The flow is present among 29.
• "$nin: [] is rejected 400" — I had spelled the operator "not in", which is not in the recognised set; $nin / nin both answer 200 with the full visible set.

Conversely, both real failures survived: reproduced on two independent boots each with fresh DBs and distinct ports, driven with plain curl (no browser, so no automation-input/hydration-race exposure), wire-level proof of no credentials on the auth-hole probes, every listed trap ruled out, and a second independent re-derivation from the captured evidence and source alone before either was written down (RUNNER rule 7, which applies to all 18 items here since every one is P0).

Parent: #9296 · baseline R0: #9298 · spec sweep: #9299 / PR #9309.

[os-zhuang]

Close-out — extracted. Wave #9296, executed under #9480. Four-way FAIL disposition applied to this record's own evidence; nothing re-judged, nothing re-run.

FAIL disposition (2 FAILs, both product defects, both already carded)

1 · records-forms.crud-roundtrip c2 → (a) product defect → #9362. DELETE unconditionally refused for any object targeted by a multiple: true reference; the dependents probe in cascadeDeleteRelations builds a bare-equality filter the driver correctly refuses, and the #8895 hardening propagates it. Extracted from #9351 on 2026-08-17; linked, not refiled, per the dup rule. Fix PR #9437 is open against it. Twice-derived here, a third time in Tier-2B #9453 through the console door. Framework defect (packages/objectql), so it stays in this repo — not a console one.

2 · integration-system.datasource-credential-refusal-matrix c7 → (a) product defect, access-control → #9391. Existence and clause only. No reproduction is restated here or anywhere else on GitHub, per the disclosure ruling at the top of #9296. Independently re-confirmed by Tier-2C #9467, which scored the item's other seven clauses pass on its own evidence. Linked, not refiled.

(d) blocked — no card owed

• access-security.no-active-org-session-semantics — blocked(fixture): the deployment is tenancy: single so ADR-0095 Layer 0 is inert and every clause vacuous, and OS_TENANCY_POSTURE=isolated is correctly refused because @objectstack/organizations is not declared. Four rounds have now reached the same dead end (QA run · access-security (9/20 items consulted) · e4e5c6e3 · 2026-08-17 · 1 PASS / 7 PARTIAL / 0 FAIL / 2 BLOCKED / 10 NOT-RUN #9330, QA run · priority:P0 · e4e5c6e3 · 2026-08-17 · 7 PASS / 7 PARTIAL / 2 FAIL / 2 BLOCKED #9334, QA run · tier2a:api-cli-build (23/23) · e4e5c6e3 · 2026-08-17 · 15 PASS / 6 PARTIAL / 1 FAIL #9417, plus the R3-B reading). The outstanding action is a ledger blocked marker on the item, which is a checklist edit parked on the anchor — not a defect card.
• studio-authoring.first-run-loop — recorded blocked(fixture) here on the inference that Studio is not installed. Superseded: Tier-2B QA run · tier2b:browser-1 (21/21) · e4e5c6e3 · 2026-08-18 · 7 PASS / 12 PARTIAL / 2 FAIL #9453 drove the loop end to end and scored it pass 6/6, zero restarts. The app registration is indeed absent; the App Builder UI is reachable. The correction is recorded on tracking: full platform-checklist regression against main @ e4e5c6e3 — five-round orchestration #9296 with the original left struck through rather than deleted.

The five checklist-accuracy findings here (stale showcase_contact count, the ?id= app-name trap, the status-with-a-default negative, the missing automated.ref on the ADR-0123 item, and --rls being load-bearing) belong to the ledger-edit PR parked on the anchor, alongside the nine from #9417 and the three from #9401. No PARTIAL gap from this record was carded.

Extracted: #9362 #9391
Parked-on: #9296

---

Generated by Claude Code