test(metadata-protocol): pin the THIRD union-branch policy copy against @objectstack/spec (#8660) (#8782)

* test(metadata-protocol): pin the third union-branch policy copy against spec (#8660)

* chore: changeset for the cross-package union-branch parity pin (#8660)

* test(metadata-protocol): read spec's export surface without a restricted root namespace import (#8660)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: hotlong

.changeset/union-branch-policy-cross-package-parity.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+---
+"@objectstack/metadata-protocol": patch
+---
+
+test(metadata-protocol): pin the THIRD union-branch policy copy against `@objectstack/spec` (#8660)
+
+The union-branch selection policy — kind-mismatch drop, fewest-issues ranking,
+`unrecognized_keys` tie-break, declaration-order determinism, depth limit 3,
+branch cap 3 — has three implementations. #8318 (PR #8659) consolidated the two
+inside `packages/spec` into one package-internal module and pinned them with a
+shared-fixture parity test. The third, `zodIssuesToMetadataIssues` in
+`protocol.ts` (the walk behind `saveMetaItem`'s `422 INVALID_METADATA` and the
+read path's diagnostics), was structurally out of that consolidation's reach:
+the shared module is deliberately not a public export (#4001), so a consumer in
+another package cannot import it.
+
+That left this copy exactly where the spec pair sat before #8318 — held in step
+by a header comment and nothing else. A future tie-break or ranking tweak lands
+in `union-branch-policy.ts` for both spec walks at once and silently not for
+this one, and then the same authored metadata gets one prescription from the
+terminal, another from the data API, and a third from Studio: the forked verdict
+#5014 ruled out.
+
+`src/union-branch-policy.cross-package-parity.test.ts` is the enforcement the
+header stood in for. One fixture corpus, one `safeParse` per fixture, three
+walks reached through PUBLIC surfaces only — `formatZodIssue` from
+`@objectstack/spec`, `zodIssuesToFields` from `@objectstack/spec/api`, and this
+package's own copy — compared as ordered `(path, message)` pairs. The corpus
+covers every element of the policy by name, plus a hand-authored expectation per
+fixture so both sides drifting the same way still fails. The two deliberate
+asymmetries (the prose-only omission line, and raw zod codes here vs the
+ADR-0114 catalog on the wire) are asserted in place rather than normalised away.
+
+**`patch`, deliberately not a skipped changeset.** No production line changes,
+no export moves, and every assertion is green on `main` before this lands — but
+the bump floor is right rather than absent, for the same reason
+`legacy-unique-guard-attribution` took one: what ships is a ratchet on
+release-relevant behaviour. The 422 envelope this pins is a published contract
+of `@objectstack/metadata-protocol`, and a consumer reading the CHANGELOG should
+be able to see when its verdict acquired mechanical protection against drifting
+away from the spec's.