docs(pm-skill): clause-2 CONTENT limb reaches published skills/** (#13746)

Records the 2026-08-31 adjudication (第 6 场总监席决裁批 #12, maintainer
verbatim 「同意」) in the ruled single source for the review chain: a change
to published `skills/**` that makes a FALSIFIABLE operator/contract semantic
claim falls under clause ②'s CONTENT limb and goes through the review chain.

The criterion is narrowed on purpose — 「可证伪的语义主张」, not 「提到契约」.
Pure operator lists, spelling and formatting changes do not trigger it; the
yardstick is the measured 10-hits/3-claims split.

The line ceiling for the file moves 48 -> 51 by the same ruling; the CEILINGS
comment carries the measurement showing the three lines could not be paid in
place without re-wrap funding, which is refused.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EnE7G31tqbxN1rqpQmzurT

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: huangyiirene

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md

@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@
 
 ## 载体纪律(挂与清)
 
+- **适用性 —— 内容肢及于 published `skills/**`**(维护者 2026-08-31 批 #12「同意」):作**可证伪的
+  算子/契约语义主张**的改动挂标走本链;⛔ 判据不是「提到契约」,纯算子清单、拼写、
+  格式不触发(标尺:10 处命中仅 3 处主张)。受管面人工合并 ⛔ 不替代本链,两道保障叠加。
 - **PR 与卡双载体同笔挂**(维护者 2026-08-22:「简化一点是否可以直接挂 PR 侧」「两边都挂好
   」; PR 一存在即挂,报告先于 PR 到达则先挂卡侧、ACCEPT 时补齐 PR 侧),同笔在该 PR 上向复审
   席账号 request review(同裁决:「也可以直接要求复审」—— 仅通知,载体仍是标签)、停手。

scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs

@@ -225,7 +225,19 @@ export const CEILINGS = new Map([
   // only in-place payment available was deleting a ruled clause. Landed count,
   // headroom 0 again, same convention.
   ['.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/state-machine.md', 44],
-  ['.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md', 48],
+  // Raised 48 → 51 by the clause-② CONTENT-limb applicability ruling (maintainer
+  // 2026-08-31, 第 6 场总监席决裁批 #12, verbatim 「同意」, adopting A + C: published
+  // `skills/**` changes making a falsifiable operator/contract semantic claim fall
+  // under the CONTENT limb, with the criterion narrowed to 「可证伪的语义主张」 and
+  // NOT 「提到契约」). The ruling sizes it at 补一句 and it landed as three lines,
+  // which could not be paid in place: the file's 41 content lines carry 577 bytes
+  // of total slack under the 120-byte cap (mean width 105.9), so absorbing the
+  // addition's 332 bytes without a new line means re-wrapping the whole file —
+  // re-wrap funding is refused per the 2026-08-17 rule, exactly as on the
+  // dispatch-runbook entry above — and the only other in-place payment available
+  // was deleting a ruled clause, refused on the state-machine precedent. Landed
+  // count, headroom 0 again, same convention.
+  ['.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/contract-review.md', 51],
   // Business-perspective decision-analysis writing guide (maintainer ruling
   // 2026-08-20: the four-facet analysis must argue from the business
   // standpoint). Set at landed line count (headroom 0, same convention).