- API-contract: `fixtures/api-contract-conformance/`. TS / C# / Java / Kotlin / Python all green — each port runs **two lanes**: a hand-rolled reference server AND its **generated** API artifact booted over HTTP (the deployed controller/routes; TS+C# full-stack vs Testcontainers PG, Java/Kotlin/Python generated controller + in-memory repo behind the consumer seam). The generated fan-out found 10 real deployment bugs golden snapshots missed. Three sub-corpora run the **generated lane only, on all five ports** — `write-through/`, `projection/` (F22: a view-only `object.projection` serves GET list + GET by id and answers every write verb with `405 {"error": "method_not_allowed"}`) and `report/` (FR-044: a view-backed `object.report` serves GET list, answers `POST` with that same `405`, and mounts no `/{id}` route). That is deliberate, not a gap: what is under test is whether a port's GENERATOR emits those routes, and a hand-rolled reference server would answer every scenario by construction. The `m2m/` sub-corpus also gates **TPH x M:N together** (base-declared, subtype-declared, abstract-mid-declared, a non-subtype source onto a subtype TARGET, and the cross-subtype source id answering `200 []`) — the two corpora were originally built disjoint (`tph/` had no relationships, `m2m/` no discriminators), which is precisely how that defect class survived.
0 commit comments