Skip to content

Where would an outside contributor be most useful? #6870

Description

@AlvaroBalbin

I contributed #6382 earlier this year (the ValueError raised while parsing streamed tool calls in the evals judge), which was merged in July. I would like to do more here, but on something you actually want rather than something I picked on my own.

CONTRIBUTING asks for an issue before starting on anything sizeable, so this is that issue.

I can commit real time over the next couple of months to one substantial piece of work, with tests and docs, and I will stay on it through review rather than dropping it after the first round. Areas I am comfortable in: the voice pipeline and its timing and interruption behaviour, tool calling and streamed LLM output, plugin implementations for STT/TTS providers, and test coverage for any of the above.

Is there something on your list that an outside contributor could take? A flaky area, a plugin you want brought up to the current interface, a subsystem that needs tests. If nothing fits right now, that is a fine answer and I will not keep pinging.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions