podspec name and Flutter iOS project name differ

[TheOneWithTheBraid]

This repository contains both a Flutter plugin as well as the original podspec of OLM for macOS.

The Flutter iOS plugin symlinks to the original podspec without correcting the Pod name. In particular, this results in an incorrect USER_HEADER_SEARCH_PATHS Xcode variable.

On a clean macOS installation, this causes the following error:

flutter build ipa --no-codesign --debug
Warning: Building for device with codesigning disabled. You will have to manually codesign before deploying to device.
Archiving business.braid.polycule...
Upgrading Runner.xcscheme
Running pod install...                                             71.2s
Running Xcode build...                                          
Xcode archive done.                                         222.4s
Failed to build iOS app
Lexical or Preprocessor Issue (Xcode): 'olm/olm_export.h' file not found
/path/to/project/.pub-cache/hosted/pub.dev/flutter_olm-2.0.0/ios/include/olm/error.h:17:9

ios/.symlinks/plugins/flutter_olm/ios/flutter_olm.podspec should present a podspec naming the project flutter_olm, whereas it in fact presents as OLMKit.

I'd suggest to separate the flutter_olm podspec from the upstream podspec and instead of a symlink provide a correct podspec.

[krille-chan]

Action points:

• Change name of the podspec
• Switch to newest version of olm
• Add macOS support

[binghatch]

As we have moved from megolm to vodozemac we can argue that this is no longer required and that olm and all related repos should be deprecated. We should consider archiving these repos as well.

@krille-chan would you be fine with that?

[krille-chan]

As we have moved from megolm to vodozemac we can argue that this is no longer required and that olm and all related repos should be deprecated. We should consider archiving these repos as well.

@krille-chan would you be fine with that?

I would wait with archiving this for another 6 months or so. There are still clients out there using this. But implementing further work like this can probably be skipped.