You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: concept_of_system.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ The formal constraints of S = (N, R, G) have a direct physical interpretation fo
72
72
73
73
An **embodied agent** is a node n ∈ N embedded in a structured E (G > 0). Its operational capacity depends on sustaining the relationships in R that allow it to transfer energy, information, and matter with other nodes in its environment. The formal constraints map to survival conditions as follows:
74
74
75
-
-*Constraint 3* — information transfer requires R ≠ Ø and |N| ≥ 1. For an embodied agent: operation requires at least one active relationship with the environment. An isolated agent with no relationships cannot transfer energy or receive input — it is degenerate.
75
+
-*Constraint 3* — information transfer requires R ≠ Ø and \|N\| ≥ 1. For an embodied agent: operation requires at least one active relationship with the environment. An isolated agent with no relationships cannot transfer energy or receive input — it is degenerate.
76
76
-*Constraint 5* — the cost of forgetting depends on the ecology encoded in E. For an embodied agent: degradation of memory and state is irreversible where the relationships sustaining it are non-linear and observer-constituted (e.g. learned skills, social bonds, navigational maps). Recovery may be impossible without re-engaging those relationships.
77
77
-*Constraint 6* — R ≠ Ø requires G > 0. For an embodied agent: the agent must inhabit a structurally adequate subdomain of E to sustain any relationship at all. A domain with insufficient structure cannot mediate the agent's required transfers.
0 commit comments