Following Berry & Haile (2014). Adopted 2026-08 for the demand material; new decks should conform.
| Object | Symbol | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Individual choice probability (model) | \sigma_{ijt} (or \sigma_{ij} in static settings) |
Conditionals: \sigma_{ij|g}, nest-level \sigma_{ig} |
| Market-level choice probability / share function | \sigma_{jt}(\cdot), e.g. \sigma_j(\delta_t,\theta) |
Inversion: \sigma_j^{-1}(\cdot) |
| Observed market share (data) | s_{jt} only |
Vector: \symbf{s}_t. Empirical frequencies may wear hats: \hat{s}_{ij} |
| Estimation equation | \sigma_j(\delta_t,\theta) = s_{jt} |
The model matches the data |
Retired symbols (do not use): \mathfrak{s}_{jt}, \mathcal{S}_{jt}/\calS for shares, \tilde{s}_{jt}, P_{ij}, S_{ij}, and \pi as a choice probability.
-
\rho— nesting parameter (Berry 1994's$\sigma$ ; matches PyBLP). Where a deck deliberately contrasts parameterizations, keep McFadden's\lambdawith$\rho = 1-\lambda$ and a remark that Berry (1994) writes$\sigma$ . -
\pi_f— profits, and nothing else. Type/mixture weights arew_i/w_{it}(sos_{jt} = \sum_i w_{it}\,\sigma_{ijt}). -
\Pi,\Sigma— demographic-interaction and random-coefficient parameter matrices (PyBLP convention). Random coefficients use capital\Sigmawhenever possible: write\beta_i = \beta + \Sigma \nu_i(with$\Sigma$ diagonal if need be) and refer to elements of$\Sigma$ , rather than lowercase\sigma_x \nu_i/\sigma \nu_i. Never use bare\sigma_0for an RC value at the truth (it now reads as the outside-good choice probability) — write\Sigma_0etc. -
Prices are always lowercase
p_{jt}; capitalPis never a price. -
\Delta_{(j,k)}(\symbf{p}) = -\partial \sigma_j / \partial p_k— the demand-derivative matrix (not\Omega). -
Diversion ratios — two distinct aggregate objects, kept notationally separate:
-
D_{jk}(\symbf{p})— small-price-change (derivative-based) diversion:$D_{jk} = \frac{\partial q_k/\partial p_j}{|\partial q_j/\partial p_j|}$ . -
D_{j \rightarrow k}— second-choice (choice-set-removal) diversion.
Classify aggregate uses by the underlying experiment (marginal price change vs. removal of
$j$ ). Individual-level diversion ratios are always plainD_{jk,i}(no arrow):$D_{jk,i} = \frac{\sigma_{ik}}{1-\sigma_{ij}}$ does not depend on the intervention — only the aggregation weights do. -
-
a— the T1EV/error scale parameter (formerly$\sigma$ ):$\sigma_{ij} = e^{V_{ij}/a}/\sum_k e^{V_{ik}/a}$ , only$\beta/a$ identified. -
Probability statements: use
\Pr(\cdot)or\prob{\cdot}(both render blackboard$\mathbb{P}$ viateaching_slides.sty), not literal\mathbb{P}.