Hey @bensheldon - just found this, nice that you forked it and maintain!
So, I'm curious why Que performs so much better than QC on - I thought, based on this release it was comparable or slightly better, but the docs here suggest otherwise: but, my comment was on a laptop - these benchmarks on big machine. Could that be it? If you have any thoughts, great.
Only I think I noticed inside the benchmarks themselves was that Que seems to enqueue, and destroy in the same transaction; I'd assume this results in zero writes to tables or indexes; however QueueClassic has a comment about not knowing how to delete it - i.e. it's actually going to be writing it to disk. I'm curious how much difference that would make, and will make a PR.
Hey @bensheldon - just found this, nice that you forked it and maintain!
So, I'm curious why Que performs so much better than QC on - I thought, based on this release it was comparable or slightly better, but the docs here suggest otherwise: but, my comment was on a laptop - these benchmarks on big machine. Could that be it? If you have any thoughts, great.
Only I think I noticed inside the benchmarks themselves was that Que seems to enqueue, and destroy in the same transaction; I'd assume this results in zero writes to tables or indexes; however QueueClassic has a comment about not knowing how to delete it - i.e. it's actually going to be writing it to disk. I'm curious how much difference that would make, and will make a PR.