📊 Current Performance
StillMe currently has ~40s latency for complex questions:
| Component |
Time |
Notes |
| RAG Retrieval |
0.36s |
ChromaDB semantic search |
| LLM Inference |
6.43s |
DeepSeek/OpenAI API |
| Post-processing |
33.57s |
Quality evaluation + rewrite + philosophical depth |
| Total |
~40s |
End-to-end latency |
🎯 Goal
Reduce total latency to <10s for complex questions while maintaining:
- ✅ Quality and philosophical depth
- ✅ Zero-tolerance hallucination policy
- ✅ Complete transparency and citation
🔍 Analysis
Post-processing is the bottleneck (83% of total time):
- Quality evaluation: Rule-based (fast)
- Rewrite engine: LLM-based (slow - multiple passes)
- Philosophical depth: LLM-based (slow - deep analysis)
Potential optimizations:
- Parallel rewrite passes - Run rewrite 1 & 2 in parallel where possible
- Caching rewrite results - Cache common patterns and templates
- Conditional rewrite - Skip rewrite for high-quality initial responses
- Streaming response - Return partial results while processing
- Batch processing - Process multiple validations in parallel
- Optimize LLM calls - Reduce token count, use faster models for simple tasks
💡 Proposed Solutions
Phase 1: Quick Wins (Target: 20-25s)
Phase 2: Parallel Processing (Target: 10-15s)
Phase 3: Advanced Optimization (Target: <10s)
🤝 How to Contribute
- Profile the code - Identify exact bottlenecks
- Propose optimizations - Share ideas in comments
- Submit PRs - Implement optimizations with tests
- Test performance - Measure improvements
📝 Notes
This is a conscious trade-off - we prioritize quality and philosophical depth over speed. However, we believe we can achieve both with the right optimizations!
Related:
- See
docs/PAPER.md Section 4.6 for current performance analysis
- See
docs/FAQ.md for performance questions
- See
backend/postprocessing/ for current implementation
📊 Current Performance
StillMe currently has ~40s latency for complex questions:
🎯 Goal
Reduce total latency to <10s for complex questions while maintaining:
🔍 Analysis
Post-processing is the bottleneck (83% of total time):
Potential optimizations:
💡 Proposed Solutions
Phase 1: Quick Wins (Target: 20-25s)
Phase 2: Parallel Processing (Target: 10-15s)
Phase 3: Advanced Optimization (Target: <10s)
🤝 How to Contribute
📝 Notes
This is a conscious trade-off - we prioritize quality and philosophical depth over speed. However, we believe we can achieve both with the right optimizations!
Related:
docs/PAPER.mdSection 4.6 for current performance analysisdocs/FAQ.mdfor performance questionsbackend/postprocessing/for current implementation