-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50.5k
Expand file tree
/
Copy pathbubble_sort.py
More file actions
158 lines (141 loc) · 5.56 KB
/
bubble_sort.py
File metadata and controls
158 lines (141 loc) · 5.56 KB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
from typing import Any
def bubble_sort_iterative(collection: list[Any]) -> list[Any]:
"""Pure implementation of bubble sort algorithm in Python.
Bubble sort repeatedly steps through the list, compares adjacent
elements, and swaps them if they are in the wrong order.
This process is repeated until the list is sorted.
Time Complexity:
Worst Case: O(n^2)
Average Case: O(n^2)
Best Case: O(n) (When the list is already sorted and
optimized with early stopping)
Space Complexity:
O(1) (in-place sorting)
:param collection: some mutable ordered collection with heterogeneous
comparable items inside
:return: the same collection ordered in ascending order
Examples:
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([0, 5, 2, 3, 2])
[0, 2, 2, 3, 5]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([])
[]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([-2, -45, -5])
[-45, -5, -2]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([-23, 0, 6, -4, 34])
[-23, -4, 0, 6, 34]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([1, 2, 3, 4])
[1, 2, 3, 4]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([3, 3, 3, 3])
[3, 3, 3, 3]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([56])
[56]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([0, 5, 2, 3, 2]) == sorted([0, 5, 2, 3, 2])
True
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([]) == sorted([])
True
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([-2, -45, -5]) == sorted([-2, -45, -5])
True
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([-23, 0, 6, -4, 34]) == sorted([-23, 0, 6, -4, 34])
True
>>> bubble_sort_iterative(['d', 'a', 'b', 'e']) == sorted(['d', 'a', 'b', 'e'])
True
>>> bubble_sort_iterative(['z', 'a', 'y', 'b', 'x', 'c'])
['a', 'b', 'c', 'x', 'y', 'z']
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([1.1, 3.3, 5.5, 7.7, 2.2, 4.4, 6.6])
[1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, 5.5, 6.6, 7.7]
>>> bubble_sort_iterative([1, 3.3, 5, 7.7, 2, 4.4, 6])
[1, 2, 3.3, 4.4, 5, 6, 7.7]
>>> import random
>>> collection_arg = random.sample(range(-50, 50), 100)
>>> bubble_sort_iterative(collection_arg) == sorted(collection_arg)
True
>>> import string
>>> collection_arg = random.choices(string.ascii_letters + string.digits, k=100)
>>> bubble_sort_iterative(collection_arg) == sorted(collection_arg)
True
"""
length = len(collection)
for i in reversed(range(length)):
swapped = False
for j in range(i):
if collection[j] > collection[j + 1]:
swapped = True
collection[j], collection[j + 1] = collection[j + 1], collection[j]
if not swapped:
break # Stop iteration if the collection is sorted.
return collection
def bubble_sort_recursive(collection: list[Any]) -> list[Any]:
"""It is similar iterative bubble sort but recursive.
Time Complexity:
Worst Case: O(n^2)
Average Case: O(n^2)
Best Case: O(n^2) (no early stopping
optimization like iterative version)
Space Complexity:
O(n) due to recursion stac
:param collection: mutable ordered sequence of elements
:return: the same list in ascending order
Examples:
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([0, 5, 2, 3, 2])
[0, 2, 2, 3, 5]
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([])
[]
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([-2, -45, -5])
[-45, -5, -2]
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([-23, 0, 6, -4, 34])
[-23, -4, 0, 6, 34]
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([0, 5, 2, 3, 2]) == sorted([0, 5, 2, 3, 2])
True
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([]) == sorted([])
True
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([-2, -45, -5]) == sorted([-2, -45, -5])
True
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([-23, 0, 6, -4, 34]) == sorted([-23, 0, 6, -4, 34])
True
>>> bubble_sort_recursive(['d', 'a', 'b', 'e']) == sorted(['d', 'a', 'b', 'e'])
True
>>> bubble_sort_recursive(['z', 'a', 'y', 'b', 'x', 'c'])
['a', 'b', 'c', 'x', 'y', 'z']
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([1.1, 3.3, 5.5, 7.7, 2.2, 4.4, 6.6])
[1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, 5.5, 6.6, 7.7]
>>> bubble_sort_recursive([1, 3.3, 5, 7.7, 2, 4.4, 6])
[1, 2, 3.3, 4.4, 5, 6, 7.7]
>>> bubble_sort_recursive(['a', 'Z', 'B', 'C', 'A', 'c'])
['A', 'B', 'C', 'Z', 'a', 'c']
>>> import random
>>> collection_arg = random.sample(range(-50, 50), 100)
>>> bubble_sort_recursive(collection_arg) == sorted(collection_arg)
True
>>> import string
>>> collection_arg = random.choices(string.ascii_letters + string.digits, k=100)
>>> bubble_sort_recursive(collection_arg) == sorted(collection_arg)
True
"""
length = len(collection)
swapped = False
for i in range(length - 1):
if collection[i] > collection[i + 1]:
collection[i], collection[i + 1] = collection[i + 1], collection[i]
swapped = True
return collection if not swapped else bubble_sort_recursive(collection)
if __name__ == "__main__":
import doctest
from random import sample
from timeit import timeit
doctest.testmod()
# Benchmark: Iterative seems slightly faster than recursive.
num_runs = 10_000
unsorted = sample(range(-50, 50), 100)
timer_iterative = timeit(
"bubble_sort_iterative(unsorted[:])", globals=globals(), number=num_runs
)
print("\nIterative bubble sort:")
print(*bubble_sort_iterative(unsorted), sep=",")
print(f"Processing time (iterative): {timer_iterative:.5f}s for {num_runs:,} runs")
unsorted = sample(range(-50, 50), 100)
timer_recursive = timeit(
"bubble_sort_recursive(unsorted[:])", globals=globals(), number=num_runs
)
print("\nRecursive bubble sort:")
print(*bubble_sort_recursive(unsorted), sep=",")
print(f"Processing time (recursive): {timer_recursive:.5f}s for {num_runs:,} runs")