@acossio @Kourtney-Burger in the database, there are deployments for both amlr01-20191206 and amlr01-20191216. I believe this is because the glider was put in the water on the 6th, recovered because of an issue, and redeployed on the 16th. We need to decide which deployment name to use, or how to handle this
The glider did at least a few dives on the 6th; I would have to go back and look for how long it was 'deployed'. We can either leave the deployment date as the 6th and add in a comment to the deployment metadata explaining the gap, or use the 16th, and ignore all data prior to the 16th. At first thought, I'm ok with either
@acossio @Kourtney-Burger in the database, there are deployments for both amlr01-20191206 and amlr01-20191216. I believe this is because the glider was put in the water on the 6th, recovered because of an issue, and redeployed on the 16th. We need to decide which deployment name to use, or how to handle this
The glider did at least a few dives on the 6th; I would have to go back and look for how long it was 'deployed'. We can either leave the deployment date as the 6th and add in a comment to the deployment metadata explaining the gap, or use the 16th, and ignore all data prior to the 16th. At first thought, I'm ok with either