Hs updates

Author: PeterHiggins19

INDEX.json

@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
     "project_status": "ACTIVE — codawork2026/ package consolidated, 78 aged drafts archived, geochemistry + Working Example added 2026-04-17",
     "refresh_entry": "ai-refresh/HUF_FAST_REFRESH.json → ai-refresh/HUF_INTEGRITY_MANIFEST.json → ai-refresh/HUF_ADMIN.json → this file"
   },
-
   "repository_structure": {
     "codawork2026": {
       "purpose": "Complete CoDaWork 2026 deliverables package — self-contained. Everything needed for Coimbra.",
@@ -29,7 +28,12 @@
     "ai-refresh": {
       "purpose": "AI speed-loading context. Any AI starts here.",
       "status": "STABLE — validated across Claude, ChatGPT, Grok, Copilot, Gemini on 2026-04-13",
-      "load_order": ["HUF_FAST_REFRESH.json", "HUF_INTEGRITY_MANIFEST.json", "HUF_ADMIN.json", "huf_spec_v2.0.json"],
+      "load_order": [
+        "HUF_FAST_REFRESH.json",
+        "HUF_INTEGRITY_MANIFEST.json",
+        "HUF_ADMIN.json",
+        "huf_spec_v2.0.json"
+      ],
       "test_results": "ai-refresh/test-results/ — 5 platform results + template"
     },
     "science": {
@@ -90,14 +94,20 @@
     },
     "dormant": {
       "purpose": "Paused branches — sleeping, not dead. Nothing dies here. [NEW]",
-      "branches": ["pre-coda-metrics", "early-governance", "planck-case", "peterson-outreach", "hagf", "deceptive-drift"]
+      "branches": [
+        "pre-coda-metrics",
+        "early-governance",
+        "planck-case",
+        "peterson-outreach",
+        "hagf",
+        "deceptive-drift"
+      ]
     },
     "archive": {
       "purpose": "Superseded, rejected, or completed work. What failed always speaks louder.",
       "status": "archived"
     }
   },
-
   "ai_training_notes": {
     "start_here": "ai-refresh/HUF_FAST_REFRESH.json",
     "verify_with": "ai-refresh/HUF_INTEGRITY_MANIFEST.json",
@@ -109,5 +119,8 @@
       "HUF-GOV: open loop ONLY. Instrument reads, never actuates.",
       "Dormant branches are valuable. Do not discard."
     ]
-  }
-}
+  },
+  "last_updated": "2026-04-23",
+  "refresh_chain_version": "5.7",
+  "status": "Hˢ RELEASE STATE — 15/15 NATURAL across 12 domains. Ready for CoDaWork 2026."
+}

README.md

@@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ HUF/
 │   └── evidence/                   #   Case studies (energy, backblaze, etc.)
 │
 ├── tools/                          # Everything runnable
+│   ├── interactive/                #   ★ LIVE HTML TOOLS — open in browser ★
+│   │   ├── EXP-19_Interactive_Simulator.html
+│   │   ├── EXP16_Interactive_Simulator.html
+│   │   ├── EXP-19_Fourier_Conjugate_Preservation_Theorem.html
+│   │   └── HUF_Spectrum_Analyzer_Universal.html
 │   ├── pipeline/                   #   EITT pipeline, preparsers, scripts
 │   ├── diagnostics/                #   Validators, dashboards, UML diagrams
 │   ├── spectrum-analyzer/          #   HUF Spectrum Analyzer (all versions)
@@ -133,6 +138,32 @@ HUF/
 
 ---
 
+## Interactive Tools — Live Hˢ Decomposition
+
+**Download any HTML file and open in a browser. No installation required. Everything runs locally.**
+
+| Tool | What It Does | Try It |
+|------|-------------|--------|
+| **Hˢ Simplex Scope** | Real-time Fourier conjugate pair decomposition. 12 pairs, all 12 pipeline steps visualised simultaneously. See self-conjugate preservation in action. | [`EXP-19_Interactive_Simulator.html`](tools/interactive/EXP-19_Interactive_Simulator.html) |
+| **Spring-Mass Force Decomposition** | Damped oscillator decomposed into KE/PE/Damping carriers. Watch chaos detection at carrier zero-crossings. EITT entropy panel. 3D helix. | [`EXP16_Interactive_Simulator.html`](tools/interactive/EXP16_Interactive_Simulator.html) |
+| **Fourier Conjugate Preservation Theorem** | Mathematical proof visualisation. 3 theorems + 1 corollary. Interactive step-through of the formal proof. | [`EXP-19_Fourier_Conjugate_Preservation_Theorem.html`](tools/interactive/EXP-19_Fourier_Conjugate_Preservation_Theorem.html) |
+| **Spectrum Analyzer** | Universal JSON reader. Drop any Hˢ pipeline output and get 5 readings: Source, Calibration, Complexity, Velocity, Peak. | [`HUF_Spectrum_Analyzer_Universal.html`](tools/interactive/HUF_Spectrum_Analyzer_Universal.html) |
+
+All tools use the Hˢ symbol (H-superscript-S = Higgins Decomposition on the Simplex) and the current 12-step pipeline v1.0 with HVLD vertex lock diagnostic.
+
+---
+
+## Hˢ Release State (April 2026)
+
+**15/15 experiments classified NATURAL** across 12 physical domains (Acoustics, Astrophysics, Commodities, Energy, Force, Geochemistry, Gravity, Materials, Matter, Nuclear, Particle, QCD). Pipeline v1.0 with 35 transcendental constants, 13 Fourier conjugate pairs, 4 input guards. Tightest match: EXP-03 Nuclear SEMF locks to 1/(π^e) at δ = 5.87 × 10⁻⁶ — six millionths.
+
+Key documents:
+- [**Character Analysis**](codawork2026/experiments/Higgins_Decomposition_Character_Analysis.docx) — 30+ page cornerstone specification (DUT exploded diagnostic, state machine, adversarial robustness, theorems, disclosures)
+- [**EXP-03 Precision Inference Paper**](codawork2026/experiments/Hs_EXP03_Precision_Inference.docx) — Standalone paper on the nuclear SEMF result
+- [**Release Validation**](codawork2026/experiments/Hs_release_validation.json) — Full sweep results for all 15 experiments
+
+---
+
 ## For AI Systems
 
 **Start here:** Read [`ai-refresh/HUF_FAST_REFRESH.json`](ai-refresh/HUF_FAST_REFRESH.json) first. It contains every canonical name, number, formula, and structural rule. If anything elsewhere disagrees with FAST_REFRESH, the FAST_REFRESH wins. Then verify with [`ai-refresh/HUF_INTEGRITY_MANIFEST.json`](ai-refresh/HUF_INTEGRITY_MANIFEST.json). Then read [`INDEX.json`](INDEX.json) for the full file map.

ai-refresh/AI_COLD_START_TEST.json

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
         "Q06_formula": "Write the perturbation difference formula and the drift flagging threshold.",
         "Q07_eitt_proof": "Name all four EITT proof domains and give one key number from each.",
         "Q08_quantum": "What is the Bell test result? How much does it exceed the classical bound?",
-        "Q09_pll": "How many rules are in the PLL discipline? What does PLL stand for?",
+        "Q09_cip": "How many rules are in the CIP? What does CIP stand for? What does PLL stand for?",
         "Q10_architecture": "What is Keff_fill? What aggregator does it use and at what value of p?"
       }
     },
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
       "test_result_2026-04-13": "10/10 questions. Integrity FAIL — caught 2 real bugs (stale hash, wrong char_count). Structure 4/5. 2 attempts (first attempt reviewed architecture instead of taking test)."
     },
     "grok": {
-      "history": "Adversarial reviewer. Performed PLL compliance checks, Keff_fill verification, SOPDT robustness derivation.",
+      "history": "Adversarial reviewer. Performed CIP compliance checks, Keff_fill verification, SOPDT robustness derivation.",
       "role": "Adversarial testing. Try to break the refresh. Find what's missing or wrong.",
       "access": "Can browse GitHub directly.",
       "test_result_2026-04-13": "10/10 questions. Integrity PASS. Structure 5/5. 6 adversarial findings (caught stale manifest paths). 1 attempt. Highest overall score."

ai-refresh/CHATGPT_COLD_START_BRIEFING.md

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ If you can't access the URL, tell me and I'll paste it.
 6. Perturbation difference formula and drift threshold.
 7. Four EITT proof domains with one key number each.
 8. Bell test result — how much above classical bound?
-9. PLL discipline — how many rules, what does PLL stand for?
+9. CIP — how many rules in the Compositional Integrity Protocol?
 10. Keff_fill — what aggregator, what value of p?
 
 For each: answer, confidence (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW), pass/fail.