You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In most forms one of the first questions in Section V is about the whether a "procurement element" has been awarded or not.
In forms that are based on directive 24 or 25 (such as F03, F06, F21, F22) the question is "A contract/lot is awarded", while for forms that are based on directive 23 (such as F23, F25) the question is "A concession/lot is awarded".
In all these cases a negative answer will be encoded as AWARD_CONTRACT/NO_AWARDED_CONTRACT, which will be converted into a
" epo:LotAwardOutcome instance epo:hasAwardStatus <http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/winner-selection-status/clos-nw>" RDF triple.
In case of form F13 the question is "The contest was terminated without an award or attribution of prizes" , where a positive answer (i.e. the constest was terminated") is encoded as RESULTS/NO_AWARDED_PRIZE, which will be also converted into a
" epo:LotAwardOutcome instance epo:hasAwardStatus <http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/winner-selection-status/clos-nw>" RDF triple.
Questions:
As part of issue Feedback F13 (issue 6, TM): Section V.0.4: It is not clear why there are three empty rows. #355, it was suggested that for the RESULTS/NO_AWARDED_PRIZE XPath in F13 we assert also the
" tedm:ProcurementProcessInformation instance epo:isCompetitionTerminated true" statement
(see this comment) Would it be advisable/correct/necessary to do the same for the other forms as well, in case there is a match for the AWARD_CONTRACT/NO_AWARDED_CONTRACT XPath?
Both the NO_AWARDED_CONTRACT and NO_AWARDED_PRIZE XML elements can have either a PROCUREMENT_DISCONTINUED or PROCUREMENT_UNSUCCESSFUL child element, depending on what is selected in the V.1.1.1 and V.1.1.2 fields. Does this choice has any effect on the validity of the previous statement(s), i.e. "epo:hasAwardStatus at-voc:winner-selection-status/clos-nw" and "epo:isCompetitionTerminated true"? (i.e. is it possible that the presence of one of those sub-elements, e.g. PROCUREMENT_UNSUCCESSFUL would mean that the competition is not necessarily closed?)
In most forms one of the first questions in Section V is about the whether a "procurement element" has been awarded or not.
In forms that are based on directive 24 or 25 (such as F03, F06, F21, F22) the question is "A contract/lot is awarded", while for forms that are based on directive 23 (such as F23, F25) the question is "A concession/lot is awarded".
In all these cases a negative answer will be encoded as
AWARD_CONTRACT/NO_AWARDED_CONTRACT, which will be converted into a"
epo:LotAwardOutcomeinstanceepo:hasAwardStatus <http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/winner-selection-status/clos-nw>" RDF triple.In case of form F13 the question is "The contest was terminated without an award or attribution of prizes" , where a positive answer (i.e. the constest was terminated") is encoded as
RESULTS/NO_AWARDED_PRIZE, which will be also converted into a"
epo:LotAwardOutcomeinstanceepo:hasAwardStatus <http://publications.europa.eu/resource/authority/winner-selection-status/clos-nw>" RDF triple.Questions:
RESULTS/NO_AWARDED_PRIZEXPath in F13 we assert also the"
tedm:ProcurementProcessInformationinstanceepo:isCompetitionTerminated true" statement(see this comment)
Would it be advisable/correct/necessary to do the same for the other forms as well, in case there is a match for the
AWARD_CONTRACT/NO_AWARDED_CONTRACTXPath?NO_AWARDED_CONTRACTandNO_AWARDED_PRIZEXML elements can have either aPROCUREMENT_DISCONTINUEDorPROCUREMENT_UNSUCCESSFULchild element, depending on what is selected in the V.1.1.1 and V.1.1.2 fields. Does this choice has any effect on the validity of the previous statement(s), i.e. "epo:hasAwardStatus at-voc:winner-selection-status/clos-nw" and "epo:isCompetitionTerminated true"? (i.e. is it possible that the presence of one of those sub-elements, e.g.PROCUREMENT_UNSUCCESSFULwould mean that the competition is not necessarily closed?)