|
I am running on gimble v1.0.3 I understand that windows are defined as number of blocks, so -w 500 would give me around 50,000bp (~500*64 callable sites), which is also confirmed by: I ran this: Then proceed to gridsearch on windows. But when I ran query and got the .bed file it shows me windows far smaller than my expected window size. Example Should -w and -s be the actual length in bp instead of number of blocks? Thank you very much for your help!! |
Replies: 2 comments
|
Please note that -w and -s are specified in terms of number of blocks in heterospecific sample pairs, i.e. you need to account for the combinatorics, when choosing these -w and -s. E.g. assuming you have block =s o 64 bases and 10 samples from each pop/taxon and wish to analyse windows of 500 blocks worth of sequence, i.e. ~ 32kb with a 20% shift between successive overlapping windows; you'd specify -w 50000 -s 10000. This accounts for the 10*10 sample pairs, i.e. 500 * 100... Hope this helps! |
|
Thank you very much for the explanation! |
Please note that -w and -s are specified in terms of number of blocks in heterospecific sample pairs, i.e. you need to account for the combinatorics, when choosing these -w and -s. E.g. assuming you have block =s o 64 bases and 10 samples from each pop/taxon and wish to analyse windows of 500 blocks worth of sequence, i.e. ~ 32kb with a 20% shift between successive overlapping windows; you'd specify -w 50000 -s 10000. This accounts for the 10*10 sample pairs, i.e. 500 * 100... Hope this helps!