MID-11186 Fix worker progress reporting#655
Open
kay1313 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixed progress reporting for worker subtasks in distributed bucketed activity tasks.
Previously, worker rows in the subtasks table used progress derived from the root/coordinator activity. As a result, all worker rows could display the same aggregate progress as the parent task.
The fix keeps the existing root-task progress path for non-worker subtasks, but for bucket-processing worker subtasks it uses the matching per-worker item progress from the parent activity state overview. This lets the GUI display worker-local processed object counts instead of coordinator aggregate progress.
Also added support for converting worker task overview item counters into
ItemsProgressInformation.Details
BucketsProcessingRoleType.WORKER.activityState.tree.activity.task[].getProgress(), so count-only worker progress does not produce a fake progress bar.Testing
Added
TestTaskInformation.testWorkerProgressUsesWorkerItemOverview.The test verifies that:
-1when no expected total is available,