diff --git a/docs/communities/DIETsimp_Lignocellulose_to_Methane_DIET_Consortia.html b/docs/communities/DIETsimp_Lignocellulose_to_Methane_DIET_Consortia.html index 31851b00..32916333 100644 --- a/docs/communities/DIETsimp_Lignocellulose_to_Methane_DIET_Consortia.html +++ b/docs/communities/DIETsimp_Lignocellulose_to_Methane_DIET_Consortia.html @@ -409,6 +409,7 @@
An Edison causal-graph pass (PMID:42229598) found no justifiable directed causal edge for this consortium: both interactions are recorded as "Proposed DIET pathway", the primary full text was inaccessible, and no perturbation (donor-removal, inhibitor, mono-/co-culture, or knockout) evidence was retrieved. The source supports two parallel donor→methanogen proposals, not a causal dependency of one on the other, so no `downstream` edge was added. Neutral-red-mediated electron delivery to M. mazei reported in a different system must not be imported here without exact-system verification. +
+ +Attaches to: ecological_interactions#DIET syntrophy from S. globosa to M. mazei, ecological_interactions#DIET syntrophy from C. aceticum to M. mazei
during anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose that S. globosa and C. aceticum metabolized intermediates
+The consortium role is stated at the level of intermediate metabolism / proposed DIET, without a validated or perturbation-tested causal mechanism — the basis for the knowledge gap.
+Aggregation and disturbance-resistant cell-to-cell attraction are observed, but no experiment demonstrates that aggregation increases butyrate oxidation or methane production in this exact coculture, so no aggregation→enhancement `downstream` edge was added. Likewise, carbon-nanotube acceleration of methane production is reported, but DIET "does not always explain the enhancement of methane production" and was not directly proven here, so a DIET mechanism is not asserted. +
+ +Attaches to: ecological_interactions#Syntrophic Aggregation and Cell-to-Cell Attraction
suggesting the cell-to-cell attraction between Syntrophomonas and Methanococcus
+Attraction/aggregation is observed, but its causal contribution to metabolic performance is untested — the basis for the knowledge gap.
+The ES5-driven increase in butyrate consumption (120%) and methane (150%) is perturbation-supported, but the mediating mechanism is unresolved: aggregation and the partner proteome response are observed correlates, not demonstrated causal mediators (the two `downstream` edges here are flagged HYPOTHESIZED accordingly). Direct interspecies electron transfer was not experimentally demonstrated for this tri-culture, and the exact ES5 bridging role remains an open question per the source. +
+ +Attaches to: ecological_interactions#Aggregation With Syntrophic Partners, ecological_interactions#Proteome Response in the Syntrophic Partners
T. flocculiformis ES5 to aggregate with the syntrophic partners
+Aggregation is reported as an association accompanying the ES5 effect, without a demonstrated causal-mediation or DIET mechanism — the basis for the knowledge gap.
+