You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Protected main is currently 7faf7a3b8a47980113982914000e724ab6a6cda5. The organization-required Strix path can still reach a nominal successful required-check conclusion without authoritative complete semantic scan evidence. Under EgressWeave's evidence contract, unavailable, skipped, neutral, no-report, no-scannable, stale, self-declared preliminary/inconclusive, or otherwise non-authoritative reviewer evidence is non-passing.
This is an assurance/control-plane defect, not evidence that a particular EgressWeave source change contains a Strix-detectable vulnerability. Protected-main release admission already rejects missing/non-semantic required evidence before publication (#191), so this issue remains specifically the merge-time organization-required Strix evidence boundary.
Fresh exact evidence (2026-08-13)
Three current evidence shapes define the boundary.
1. No semantic scan despite required-check success — PR #212
workflow evidence says one scannable changed file was materialized for findings attribution;
the first provider path hit a typed NVIDIA NIM 429 Too Many Requests, then bounded fallback reached nvidia_nim/nvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1.5;
the successful internal run records scan_completed=true, but its executive summary explicitly characterizes the result as a preliminary scan and recommends further action for thorough validation; its technical analysis likewise calls the work a preliminary phase.
Therefore job=success, artifact existence, and even scan_completed=true are insufficient by themselves. A report that declares its own result preliminary/incomplete is non-passing semantic acceptance evidence. The 429 is provider/infrastructure evidence, not a source vulnerability.
the report records a completed scoped semantic result rather than a no-scan or self-declared preliminary outcome.
This is the positive-control evidence shape the terminal gate must preserve. It does not by itself satisfy other independent merge gates.
Historical #192 backend-unavailable evidence remains RCA history only and is not transferred to current heads.
Read-only central owner
The authoritative organization-owned incident remains ContextualWisdomLab/.github#891, [Security] Fail closed when Strix produces no authoritative scan evidence, and is still open. Protected central main is currently 6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba. .github remains read-only to the EgressWeave writer.
Immediate causes now observed: backend/provider unavailability, no-scannable/no-report execution, and success-shaped reports whose own semantics remain preliminary/incomplete.
Root cause: workflow transport completion and semantic-review completion/quality are not represented as one fail-closed, machine-verifiable terminal admission decision.
Systemic consequence: GitHub can see a successful required check while the exact source head lacks authoritative completed semantic review.
Owner: organization-owned central Strix required workflow/control plane.
Falsifiable hypothesis
If the central Strix path emits and validates a typed exact-head evidence envelope whose terminal semantic status distinguishes completed-authoritative from provider failure, skipped/no-scannable, malformed/indeterminate, and preliminary/incomplete outcomes, then only the positive-control shape can pass while all observed false-green shapes become terminal non-passing.
Distinct remedies and feasibility
Preferred — typed central evidence envelope plus always-running terminal gate. Bind repository, PR/source event identity, exact head, relevant base context, trusted producer, scan scope, provider execution state, semantic terminal status, findings/result digest, and artifact identity. The gate passes only completed-authoritative evidence for the exact accepted source identity.
Provider/executor emits an explicit completeness disposition. Do not make GitHub acceptance depend primarily on parsing free-form model prose such as “preliminary”. A machine-readable terminal semantic status must be produced by the trusted workflow/provider boundary and validated fail-closed.
Bounded retry/fallback for classified transient provider failures.429, transport failure, timeout, or equivalent transient errors may retry within attempt/wall-clock limits; exhausted or semantically incomplete outcomes remain non-passing.
Deterministic negative controls. Cover backend unavailable, empty output, no-scannable, report-missing, malformed receipt, stale head, scan_completed=true with non-authoritative/preliminary terminal status, timeout, cancelled execution, and fallback exhaustion.
Rejected: clean-head churn merely to retrigger a provider, treating wrapper/report existence as semantic success, substituting CodeRabbit/OpenCode/Noema/SAST/GHAS, parsing unconstrained prose as the sole gate, copying/forking the central Strix workflow locally, adding credentials, or weakening branch/ruleset gates.
Acceptance criteria
Central owner fixes the required Strix result-mapping boundary without weakening branch protection, independent review, least privilege, immutable pins, or other scanners.
Required-check success is emitted only for trusted, machine-verifiable, exact-head completed-authoritative semantic evidence in the applicable live-base context.
Backend unavailable, provider/rate-limit exhaustion, timeout, empty output, skipped/no-scannable/no-report, cancelled, malformed/indeterminate, predecessor/stale/synthetic/untrusted-producer, and self-declared preliminary/incomplete semantic outcomes produce terminal non-passing evidence.
scan_completed=true, wrapper success, or artifact existence alone cannot satisfy the gate.
A typed terminal completeness/status field is authoritative; free-form model prose is diagnostic, not the primary admission API.
Transport state, semantic Strix result, other model reviews, SAST/GHAS, Dependency Review and merge authorization remain separate evidence classes.
Provider retries/fallback remain finite and classify infrastructure failures honestly without synthesizing source vulnerabilities.
Diagnostics do not print credentials, secret material or unnecessary source/request data.
After corrected central logic reaches protected central main, run an unchanged EgressWeave candidate through it and prove both fail-closed negative controls and authoritative recovery.
Revalidate EgressWeave live ruleset, exact head/live base, all other required workflows, Dependency Review, unresolved findings and review evidence before any affected merge.
Close only after protected-central repair plus protected EgressWeave consumer evidence proves corrected merge-time behavior end to end.
Non-goals
No claim that Strix is the sole security reviewer or that a current source vulnerability exists. No EgressWeave-local required-workflow fork, substitute scanner, extra reviewer credential, autonomous merge authority, release bypass, or clean-head mutation solely to retrigger provider behavior.
Buyer-visible merge-assurance gap
Protected
mainis currently7faf7a3b8a47980113982914000e724ab6a6cda5. The organization-required Strix path can still reach a nominal successful required-check conclusion without authoritative complete semantic scan evidence. Under EgressWeave's evidence contract, unavailable, skipped, neutral, no-report, no-scannable, stale, self-declared preliminary/inconclusive, or otherwise non-authoritative reviewer evidence is non-passing.This is an assurance/control-plane defect, not evidence that a particular EgressWeave source change contains a Strix-detectable vulnerability. Protected-main release admission already rejects missing/non-semantic required evidence before publication (#191), so this issue remains specifically the merge-time organization-required Strix evidence boundary.
Fresh exact evidence (2026-08-13)
Three current evidence shapes define the boundary.
1. No semantic scan despite required-check success — PR #212
7faf7a3b8a47980113982914000e724ab6a6cda5;417ed4b066c50584b41942c61bc68bd82348d700;31656787007concluded wrapper success;No scannable changed files in pull request; skipping Strix quick scan.;2. Report exists, but the report itself says the scan is preliminary — PR #203
7faf7a3b8a47980113982914000e724ab6a6cda5;9ac4bc2de5bdba2e92be184e46a42ef55627bd77;31663947448, job/check94334450406, completed success;9167636849(strix-reports), SHA-256ec665dbe9b99532fff3605bc4766282be2d4074daf62d3d15343d607b901347c;429 Too Many Requests, then bounded fallback reachednvidia_nim/nvidia/llama-3.3-nemotron-super-49b-v1.5;scan_completed=true, but its executive summary explicitly characterizes the result as a preliminary scan and recommends further action for thorough validation; its technical analysis likewise calls the work a preliminary phase.Therefore
job=success, artifact existence, and evenscan_completed=trueare insufficient by themselves. A report that declares its own result preliminary/incomplete is non-passing semantic acceptance evidence. The 429 is provider/infrastructure evidence, not a source vulnerability.3. Positive control — substantive scoped semantic scan — PR #214
6ecc1b2e2caa1af5293a28a5d07a5eddda6f0327on the same protected-main base;31655407058, job/check94308699374;9164364412, SHA-256ef1171b8f94cd6c71f8fa44f3979c84487134218bf18dff8d34b826b3e2822c3;This is the positive-control evidence shape the terminal gate must preserve. It does not by itself satisfy other independent merge gates.
Historical #192 backend-unavailable evidence remains RCA history only and is not transferred to current heads.
Read-only central owner
The authoritative organization-owned incident remains
ContextualWisdomLab/.github#891,[Security] Fail closed when Strix produces no authoritative scan evidence, and is still open. Protected centralmainis currently6eb06cdd08c79a06f7b390069d4ffa49e2eb7dba..githubremains read-only to the EgressWeave writer.RCA
Falsifiable hypothesis
If the central Strix path emits and validates a typed exact-head evidence envelope whose terminal semantic status distinguishes
completed-authoritativefrom provider failure, skipped/no-scannable, malformed/indeterminate, and preliminary/incomplete outcomes, then only the positive-control shape can pass while all observed false-green shapes become terminal non-passing.Distinct remedies and feasibility
completed-authoritativeevidence for the exact accepted source identity.429, transport failure, timeout, or equivalent transient errors may retry within attempt/wall-clock limits; exhausted or semantically incomplete outcomes remain non-passing.scan_completed=truewith non-authoritative/preliminary terminal status, timeout, cancelled execution, and fallback exhaustion.Acceptance criteria
scan_completed=true, wrapper success, or artifact existence alone cannot satisfy the gate.main, run an unchanged EgressWeave candidate through it and prove both fail-closed negative controls and authoritative recovery.Non-goals
No claim that Strix is the sole security reviewer or that a current source vulnerability exists. No EgressWeave-local required-workflow fork, substitute scanner, extra reviewer credential, autonomous merge authority, release bypass, or clean-head mutation solely to retrigger provider behavior.
Related boundaries
ContextualWisdomLab/.github#897: separate Dependency Review fail-closed defect; Dependency Review and Strix remain independent evidence channels.