Summary
Ship a client-facing educational website that explains how Sigstack works — with clear copy and graphs/diagrams — before (and independent of) checkout.
Parent commercial surface: #13. This issue is the first slice of that site: teach the product suite. Defer Stripe, subscriptions, and payments until the explainers are solid.
Product suite to document (post-#21):
- Language Threads — primary bridging model (multilingual main + N language sidecars)
- In-chat translation — same-group auto / quote translate (secondary)
- Voice transcription — speech → text in Signal
Related UX framing: #22 (menus promote Language Threads). Umbrella: #10.
Design system
Use the Bread Cooperative design system as the visual / UI source of truth for this site (foundations, components, Figma + AI setup). Do not invent a one-off Sigstack visual language — follow Bread DS tokens, components, and golden rules, and extend that repo if Sigstack needs app-specific patterns.
Why
Repo docs (docs/language-threads.md, docs/in-chat-translation.md, docs/voice-transcription.md, docs/two-cvm-architecture.md) are operator/dev oriented. Organizers need a plain-language front door that answers:
- What is this?
- Which mode do I want?
- How do messages flow between groups / in-thread?
- What do I type in Signal to get started?
Diagrams matter more than long prose for Language Threads (main ↔ sidecars fan-out is hard to picture from commands alone).
Scope (education only)
Site content
Graphs / diagrams
Prefer one clear diagram per product over dense architecture charts. Export-friendly (SVG/PNG) so the same art can later reuse on #13 checkout pages. Diagram styling should stay consistent with Bread DS.
Source of truth
Out of scope
- Stripe, pricing, a-la-carte / all-access checkout, subscription management — stay on #13
- Bot command menu implementation — #22
- Phala deploy / CVM ops
- Changing relay or transcription behavior
Success criteria
- A new organizer can understand Language Threads vs in-chat from the site without reading the repo
- Each product has at least one diagram that matches live behavior
- Site UI follows bread-design-system
- No payment / Stripe UI required to ship this slice
- #13 can later reuse the same pages/diagrams for commerce
Related
Summary
Ship a client-facing educational website that explains how Sigstack works — with clear copy and graphs/diagrams — before (and independent of) checkout.
Parent commercial surface: #13. This issue is the first slice of that site: teach the product suite. Defer Stripe, subscriptions, and payments until the explainers are solid.
Product suite to document (post-#21):
Related UX framing: #22 (menus promote Language Threads). Umbrella: #10.
Design system
Use the Bread Cooperative design system as the visual / UI source of truth for this site (foundations, components, Figma + AI setup). Do not invent a one-off Sigstack visual language — follow Bread DS tokens, components, and golden rules, and extend that repo if Sigstack needs app-specific patterns.
Why
Repo docs (
docs/language-threads.md,docs/in-chat-translation.md,docs/voice-transcription.md,docs/two-cvm-architecture.md) are operator/dev oriented. Organizers need a plain-language front door that answers:Diagrams matter more than long prose for Language Threads (main ↔ sidecars fan-out is hard to picture from commands alone).
Scope (education only)
Site content
Graphs / diagrams
Prefer one clear diagram per product over dense architecture charts. Export-friendly (SVG/PNG) so the same art can later reuse on #13 checkout pages. Diagram styling should stay consistent with Bread DS.
Source of truth
Out of scope
Success criteria
Related