Hi, Akash.
I'm not sure if I can submit this content here, but I have some questions related to simulation result and setting.
I have attached 3 flash.par files I tested and corresponding result animation (velocity magnitude contour).
12212022.zip
I changed (1) ins_cfl, ins_sigma, (2) ins_cfl, ins_sigma, ins_dtSpec, dtinit, (3) ins_cfl, ins_sigma. All the nuc_numSites = 1000.
First question is that I could get converged results, but I'm not sure why all the results seem to be different (Bubble generation, movement, flow velocity, and so on).
I think dt determined by CFL number affects simulation result.
Second question is about CFL number. If I know correctly, CFL number is defined dt, dx, and velocity.
I think if clf number is fixed, then dt is determined by dx and velocity.
I wonder what ins_sigma, ins_dtSpect.
Following question is if using adaptive mesh requires mesh refinement or grid independence test.
I appreciate you taking the time in advance!
Hi, Akash.
I'm not sure if I can submit this content here, but I have some questions related to simulation result and setting.
I have attached 3 flash.par files I tested and corresponding result animation (velocity magnitude contour).
12212022.zip
I changed (1) ins_cfl, ins_sigma, (2) ins_cfl, ins_sigma, ins_dtSpec, dtinit, (3) ins_cfl, ins_sigma. All the nuc_numSites = 1000.
First question is that I could get converged results, but I'm not sure why all the results seem to be different (Bubble generation, movement, flow velocity, and so on).
I think dt determined by CFL number affects simulation result.
Second question is about CFL number. If I know correctly, CFL number is defined dt, dx, and velocity.
I think if clf number is fixed, then dt is determined by dx and velocity.
I wonder what ins_sigma, ins_dtSpect.
Following question is if using adaptive mesh requires mesh refinement or grid independence test.
I appreciate you taking the time in advance!